An experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube election

The 2008 US presidential election was called the ‘YouTube Election’. However, scholars know little about how the internet influences attitudes toward politics. To address this, we conduct an experiment to test the effects of exposure to the YouTube channel, ‘YouChoose’08’, on young adults during the 2008 US presidential election. We find that those exposed to YouChoose’08 exhibit more cynicism toward the US government, yet also had a heightened sense that they influence the political system. Exposure to YouChoose’08 had no influence on attitudes toward candidates or internet sources.

[1]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Techno politics in presidential campaigning : new voices, new technologies, and new voters , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Experimental foundations of political science , 1993 .

[3]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[4]  Jane B. Singer,et al.  Journalists and News Bloggers: Complements, Contradictions and Challenges , 2006 .

[5]  Daekyung Kim Abandoning traditional news? Examining factors influencing the displacement effects of online news on traditional news media , 2006 .

[6]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[7]  A Lowin,et al.  Approach and avoidance: alternate modes of selective exposure to information. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. Arndt Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[9]  D. Clayton The Presidential Campaign of Barack Obama: A Critical Analysis of a Racially Transcendent Strategy , 2010 .

[10]  M. R. Kerbel,et al.  Blog for America and Civic Involvement , 2005 .

[11]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[12]  Michael Margolis Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11 , 2007 .

[14]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[15]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Scott L. Althaus,et al.  Differences in Knowledge Acquisition among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of a National Newspaper , 2000 .

[17]  Natalie Jomini Stroud,et al.  Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure , 2008 .

[18]  K. B. Murray A Test of Services Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition Activities , 1991 .

[19]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[20]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[21]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[22]  M. Castells Die Internet-Galaxie , 2001 .

[23]  Richard F. Carter,et al.  Effectiveness of a Political Telethon , 1959 .

[24]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[25]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[26]  R. Garrett Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[27]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[28]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Stealth soapboxes: political information efficacy, cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers , 2008, New Media Soc..

[29]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. , 1984 .

[30]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[31]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[32]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information , 2002 .

[33]  C. Firestone,et al.  Elections in cyberspace : toward a new era in American politics , 1996 .

[34]  W. Bennett An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics , 1996 .

[35]  Melissa Wall,et al.  Blogging Gulf War II , 2006 .

[36]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[37]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[38]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment , 2009, New Media Soc..

[39]  Dafna Lemish,et al.  Spinning the web of identity: the roles of the internet in the lives of immigrant adolescents , 2009, New Media Soc..

[40]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[41]  David L. Paletz,et al.  Selective Exposure: The Potential Boomerang Effect , 1972 .

[42]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Rocking the Vote and More: An Experimental Study of the Impact of Youth Political Portals , 2008 .

[43]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .