N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences

Understanding others' sequences of action is a fundamental aspect of human movement and is the key to detecting goal directed behavior and intentional actions. Human action contains semantic information whereby logical chains of events are entirely dependent on the sequence in which they are performed. The sequential nature of action ensures that an observing individual anticipates the conclusion of a viewed action. This experiment reports on the results of 15 participants who viewed videos of an actress performing actions. Half the stimuli contained an anticipated conclusion to the action whereas half did not. Results from the passive viewing of stimuli depicting eating actions indicated an increased N400 response over frontal, central and parietal regions when viewing the unanticipated conclusions of the actions as compared with the amplitude for the anticipated condition. These results show that (1) neural systems exist to rapidly discern semantic information in actions, and (2) the N400 component, which predicts semantic information in language, also anticipates information within goal directed action.

[1]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[3]  Patric Bach,et al.  Communicating hands: ERPs elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  P. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[5]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Mindblindness. An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind Simon Baron-Cohen 1995 , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[7]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  T. Striano,et al.  The directed attention model of infant social cognition , 2007 .

[10]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Interpersonal Understanding Fuels Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[11]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  FOXP2 and the mirror system , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[13]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[14]  Vincent M. Reid,et al.  Social cognition in the first year , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Imitation, mirror neurons and autism , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  M. Corballis.  From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language , 2002 .

[18]  Ying Choon Wu,et al.  Meaningful gestures: electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[20]  Phillip J Holcomb,et al.  Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[23]  M. Kutas,et al.  The Search for Common Sense: An Electrophysiological Study of the Comprehension of Words and Pictures in Reading , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.