A decision support approach to value flexibility considering uncertainty and future information

Abstract Flexible strategies have become increasingly important for making strategic decisions under uncertainty conditions, once to consider flexibility in projects to engender the option of making return-maximizing decisions, since uncertainty can be resolved over a project's lifetime. The activities related to reservoir development are inherently associated with decisions making under uncertainty conditions and flexible solutions are very advantageous, allowing the option of making return-maximizing decisions, the uncertainty is resolved over a project's lifetime. One of the technologies that fit in this context are the smart wells, since this technology has the ability to acquire relevant requested information for future decision-making, enabling the generation of a development strategy with future flexibility. However, to value its flexibility if we do not account for uncertainty when performing an optimization, the resulting strategy will have two key shortcomings: it will assign too high value to the smart wells, and it will not take advantage of the ability of the smart wells to adapt and mitigate to uncertainty. We propose a strategy that allows the valuation of flexibility under uncertainty, seeking the flow control strategy that maximizes the expected net present value, dynamically reacting to new information as it is acquired. We demonstrate the proposed approach using a tank drainage problem for which we can evaluate optimization solutions for a broad range of scenarios, including model uncertainty and the flexibility to accommodate future measurements, with a reduced time of evaluation. Then we applied this proposed approach on a reservoir model that highlights its novel aspects: asset optimization under uncertainty, flexible control based on future information, and quantification of the value of flexibility and future measurements. In addition to valuing flexibility and future information, which contributes to the selection of appropriate smart-well technology and measurements, the proposed approach delivers a decision tree that describes a flexible strategy of optimum valve settings that properly accounts for future measurements and their impact on uncertainty reduction. This approach gives a qualitative value, indicating whether the field has the potential of significant improvement using smart wells, and a quantitative valuation of the benefits of smart completions resulting in a realizable strategy to guide the control of these completions in a real field management project.

[1]  Arashi A. Ajayi,et al.  Managing Operational Challenges in the Installation of an Intelligent Well Completion In A Deepwater Environment , 2008 .

[2]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Optimizing smart well controls under geologic uncertainty , 2010 .

[3]  Peter S. Pacheco Parallel programming with MPI , 1996 .

[4]  Celso Cesar M. Branco,et al.  Development of the Brazilian Pre-Salt Fields - When To Pay for Information and When To Pay for Flexibility , 2012 .

[5]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Assisted optimization method for comparison between conventional and intelligent producers considering uncertainties , 2015 .

[6]  Marco Aurélio Cavalcanti Pacheco,et al.  Proactive and Reactive Strategies for Optimal Operational Design: An Application in Smart Wells , 2015 .

[7]  David R. Davies,et al.  A rigorous stochastic coupling of reliability and reservoir performance when defining the value of intelligent wells , 2007 .

[8]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Method for the Global Optimization of Expensive Functions , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[9]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Dynamic Optimization of Waterflooding With Smart Wells Using Optimal Control Theory , 2004 .

[10]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Optimal placement design of inflow control valve using a dynamic optimization process based on technical and economic indicators , 2015 .

[11]  Michael R. Konopczynski,et al.  Evaluating Intelligent-Well-System Requirement for an Offshore Field Development , 2005 .

[12]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Optimal control of ICV's and well operating conditions for the water-alternating-gas injection process , 2017 .

[13]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of correlated non-normal geotechnical parameters using Gaussian copula , 2012, Science China Technological Sciences.

[14]  Kwame Nkrumah,et al.  Intelligent well Technology- Dealing with Gas Coning Problems in Production wells , 2014 .

[15]  Ahmed H. Elsheikh,et al.  Proactive Optimization of Intelligent-Well Production Using Stochastic Gradient-Based Algorithms , 2016 .

[16]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  An Elementary Approach To Thinking Under Uncertainty , 1985 .

[17]  John T. Han There is Value in Operational Flexibility: An Intelligent Well Application , 2003 .

[18]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Management of Water Breakthrough Using Intelligent Well Technology , 2001 .

[19]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[20]  van den Pmj Paul Hof,et al.  Value of information in parameter identification and optimization of hydrocarbon reservoirs , 2015 .

[21]  Derek Mathieson,et al.  Intelligent well technology in mature assets , 2001 .

[22]  Changhong Gao,et al.  A Literature Review on Smart Well Technology , 2007 .

[23]  Marley M. B. R. Vellasco,et al.  Optimization system for valve control in intelligent wells under uncertainties , 2010 .

[24]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  THE ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER IN RESERVOIR ENGINEERING-A REVIEW , 2009 .

[25]  K. Rashid,et al.  An adaptive multiquadric radial basis function method for expensive black-box mixed-integer nonlinear constrained optimization , 2013 .

[26]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Use of Oil Reservoir Simulation to Estimate Value of Flexibility , 2013 .

[27]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  Optimization of Smart Well Production through Nonlinear Model Predictive Control , 2008 .

[28]  Jesse Constantine,et al.  EA Field Development: Intelligent Well Completion, Offshore Nigeria , 2004 .

[29]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[30]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Decision analysis under uncertainty for smart well deployment , 2004 .

[31]  J. Carroll,et al.  K-midranges clustering , 1998 .

[32]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  UNISIM-I: Synthetic Model for Reservoir Development and Management Applications , 2015 .

[33]  Benoit Couet,et al.  An Efficient Procedure for Expensive Reservoir-Simulation Optimization Under Uncertainty , 2013 .

[34]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  Evolutionary proxy tuning for expensive evaluation functions: a real-case application to petroleum reservoir optimization , 2004 .