Living with bushfires on the urban-bush interface

Due to the attractiveness of living in a natural environment, more people are likely to reside in urban-bush interface areas that expose them to dangers from bushfires. Surveys conducted after fires over 2009-2015, indicated that many residents in urban-bush interface areas under-estimate their bushfire risk and do not prepare adequately for these events. For this study, householders living in urban-bush interface areas of Melbourne completed an online survey that showed that the attractiveness of the natural environment setting was the major reason for living in the location. The majority of respondents indicated bushfires as a negative feature of living in the urban-bush- interface. Compared with findings from post-bushfire surveys during 2009-2015, a greater number of respondents had a bushfire survival plan to evacuate as well as being prepared to evacuate if threatened. However, one in eight householders planned to 'wait and see' how a fire developed before taking action. Also, levels of activities to reduce house vulnerability to bushfire were low. For some householders, this was because they believed such preparations would be ineffective and, thus, pointless. This unpreparedness presents challenges to emergency management organisations and, in particular, fire agencies.

[1]  D. Every,et al.  Australian wildland-urban interface householders’ wildfire safety preparations: ‘Everyday life’ project priorities and perceptions of wildfire risk , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[2]  Alexandra D. Syphard,et al.  Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  John Handmer,et al.  Self-evacuation archetypes in Australian bushfire , 2018 .

[4]  A. Llausàs,et al.  Spatial planning and changing landscapes: a failure of policy in peri-urban Victoria, Australia , 2016 .

[5]  Mark D M Davis,et al.  Between bushfire risk and love of environment: preparedness, precariousness and survival in the narratives of urban fringe dwellers in Australia , 2015 .

[6]  Jim McLennan,et al.  At-risk householders' responses to potential and actual bushfire threat: an analysis of findings from seven Australian post-bushfire interview studies 2009-2014 , 2015 .

[7]  Amy L. Griffin,et al.  Social vulnerability in the context of bushfire risk at the urban-bush interface in Sydney: a case study of the Blue Mountains and Ku-ring-gai local council areas , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[8]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Joseph Beringer,et al.  Community fire safety at the urban/rural interface: The bushfire risk , 2000 .

[10]  Jack D. Cohen.  Preventing Disaster: Home Ignitability in the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[11]  H. Pearce.  The 2017 Port Hills wildfires - a window into New Zealand's fire future? , 2018 .

[12]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Does Place Attachment Predict Wildfire Mitigation and Preparedness? A Comparison of Wildland–Urban Interface and Rural Communities , 2015, Environmental Management.

[13]  J. McLennan,et al.  Checklist Items For Researchers: Householder Preparations For Bushfires , 2011 .