Smooth and sampled motion

Stroboscopic or sampled motion is indistinguishable from smooth motion if the frequency of sampling is sufficiently high. We report measurements of the minimum sample frequency for smooth motion of drifting sinusoidal gratings (extended and truncated) which varied in spatial frequency from 0.06 to 24 c/deg, in temporal frequency from 1.5 to 24 Hz and in contrast from 3 to 100 times detection threshold. Threshold sampling frequency for smoothness increased with temporal frequency and contrast, and inversely with spatial frequency. The threshold step size associated with the sampling frequency ranged from 20" arc (for gratings of 24 c/deg) to 6 deg (for gratings of 0.06 c/deg). Calculations of the spurious frequencies introduced by sampling lead us to conclude that motion appears smooth provided that sampling is above the Nyquist limit and that the amplitude of the spurious components is below their independent threshold.

[1]  G. Johansson.  Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[2]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[3]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[5]  J. T. Petersik,et al.  Failure to find an absolute retinal limit of a putative short-range process in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[6]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  D. E. Pearson,et al.  Transmission and display of pictorial information , 1975 .

[8]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Seeing objects in motion , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Displacement thresholds for coherent apparent motion in random dot-patterns , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  Campbell Fw.  Recent attempts to link psychophysics with neurophysiology in vision research. , 1979 .

[15]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[17]  C. O. Roelofs,et al.  Some aspects of apparent motion , 1953 .

[18]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots , 1984, Vision Research.

[19]  C. Baker,et al.  The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[20]  P. A. Kolers.  Aspects of motion perception , 1972 .

[21]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[22]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[23]  C. Tyler.  Observations on Spatial-Frequency Doubling , 1974, Perception.

[24]  T. Poggio,et al.  Visual hyperacuity: spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.