Perceiving Design as Modelling: A Cybernetic Systems Perspective

The creation and use of models is central to engineering design, to the extent that designing might be perceived as a propagation from model to model and modelling may be described as the language of the designer (the terms product model and artefact model are used synonymously throughout this chapter). Given this, how should design activities be coordinated and how should the design process be regulated? This chapter suggests that a cybernetic perspective may help to understand designing as a self-regulated modelling system and help to reach a better understanding of the effectiveness of models and modelling as used in design. This perspective emphasises the role of models in progressing the design and design process evolution. In particular, it suggests that most models in design fulfil a synthetic role. For instance, when designers sketch a mechanism, then formalise and analyse it, they are on one level analysing, but stepping back they are synthesising something that did not previously exist. What makes a model a good model thus lies not so much in goodness of fit, meaning how accurately it represents observations made, but rather the degree to which it informs decision-making that turns out to add value for a given purpose and context. Implications of a cybernetic perspective that could guide effective modelling in design are discussed.

[1]  Donald A. Schön Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[3]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  A meta-model for communication in engineering design , 2005 .

[4]  A. Werr,et al.  Models in Action: How Management Models are Interpreted in New Product Development , 2005 .

[5]  John Clarkson,et al.  Models of designing , 2005 .

[6]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[7]  Karl W. Deutsch On Communication Models in the Social Sciences , 1952 .

[8]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Design models in mechatronic product development , 1989 .

[9]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design , 2004 .

[10]  Marx W. Wartofsky Pictures, Representation, and the Understanding , 1979 .

[11]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  A cybernetic perspective on methods and process models in collaborative designing , 2012 .

[12]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Modelling Iteration in Engineering Design , 2007 .

[13]  Tyson R. Browning The many views of a process: Toward a process architecture framework for product development processes , 2009 .

[14]  E. Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting , 1996, IEEE Spectrum.

[15]  Albert Albers,et al.  A generalised framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes , 2011 .

[16]  David C. Wynn,et al.  Model-based approaches to support process improvement in complex product development , 2007 .

[17]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience , 2008 .

[18]  Martin Ebro,et al.  The Foundation for Robust Design: Enabling Robustness Through Kinematic Design and Design Clarity , 2012 .

[19]  John S. Gero,et al.  Sketching as mental imagery processing , 2001 .

[20]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[21]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[22]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[23]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design process improvement : a review of current practice , 2005 .

[24]  B. V. Fraassen Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective , 2008 .

[25]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[26]  Stephen Mulhall,et al.  Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 1998 .

[27]  Gordon Pask,et al.  The Cybernetics of Human Learning and Performance , 1977 .

[28]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Principles of Systems and Cybernetics: an evolutionary perspective , 1991 .

[29]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[30]  S. Hartmann,et al.  Models in Science , 2006 .

[31]  C. Eckert,et al.  What is a Process Model? Reflections on the Epistemology of Design Process Models , 2010 .

[32]  H. Foerster Understanding Understanding , 2002, Springer New York.

[33]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  Product development process modeling , 1999 .

[34]  Harald Störrle,et al.  WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESSES , 2011 .

[35]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  COMPARISONS OF DESIGN METHODOLOGIES AND PROCESS MODELS ACROSS DOMAINS: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2011 .

[36]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The designer as a team o f one , 1995 .

[37]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes , 2010 .

[38]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Key concepts in modeling product development processes , 2006 .

[39]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design , 2006 .

[40]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Modelling—The Language of the Designer , 1994 .

[41]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[42]  M. Larson,et al.  Architecture: The Story of Practice. , 1992 .

[43]  Eberhardt Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting (2nd ed.) , 2000 .

[44]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  A scientific approach to engineering design , 1987 .