A comparative study on modelling material removal rate by ANFIS and polynomial methods in electrical discharge machining process

Abstract Due to the controversy associated with modelling Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) processes based on physical laws; this task is predominantly accomplished using empirical modelling methods. The modelling studies reported in the literature deal predominantly with quantitative parameters i.e. ones with numerical levels. In fact, modelling categorical parameters has been devoted a scant attention. This study reports the results of an EDM experiment conducted on the Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Its aim was to model the relationship between the Material Removal Rate (MRR) and the parameters of the process, namely, current, pulse on-time and pulse off-time along with a categorical factor (electrode material). The modelling process was accomplished using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and polynomial modelling approaches. In fact, one purpose of this study was to compare the performance of these modelling approaches as no study was found contrasting their prediction capability in the literature. Regarding the polynomial model, two numerical parameters (current and pulse on-time) were declared significant in the ANOVA together with the electrode material and its interaction with pulse on-time. Thus, they were all incorporated in the developed polynomial model. Furthermore, five ANFIS models with 6, 9, 19, 21 and 51 rules were developed utilizing the first order Sugeno fuzzy approach by back-propagation neural networks training algorithm. Of these, the ANFIS model with 21 rules was the best. This model also outperformed the polynomial model remarkably in terms of predicting error, residuals range and the correlation coefficient between the experimental and predicted MRR values. The study sheds light on the powerful learning capability of ANFIS models and its superiority over the conventional polynomial models in terms of modelling complex non-linear machining processes.

[1]  J. McGeough.  Advanced Methods Of Machining , 1988 .

[2]  Angelos P. Markopoulos,et al.  Artificial neural network models for the prediction of surface roughness in electrical discharge machining , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[3]  Mohan Kumar Pradhan,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy and neural network-based prediction of various responses in electrical discharge machining of AISI D2 steel , 2010 .

[4]  B. Yan,et al.  The effect in EDM of a dielectric of a urea solution in water on modifying the surface of titanium , 2005 .

[5]  Prasanta Sahoo,et al.  Roughness modelling and optimisation in EDM using response surface method for different work piece materials , 2009 .

[6]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Design of experiments for engineers and scientists , 2003 .

[7]  T. L. Kelley,et al.  An Unbiased Correlation Ratio Measure. , 1935, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C. J. Luis,et al.  Material removal rate and electrode wear study on the EDM of silicon carbide , 2005 .

[9]  Pedro J. Arrazola,et al.  Comparison of the machinabilities of Ti6Al4V and TIMETAL® 54M using uncoated WC–Co tools , 2010 .

[10]  Sachin Maheshwari,et al.  Some investigations into the electric discharge machining of hardened tool steel using different electrode materials , 2004 .

[11]  V. N. Moiseev.  Titanium in Russia , 2005 .

[12]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  Workpiece surface roughness and integrity after WEDM of Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel 718 using minimum damage generator technology , 2008 .

[13]  I. Puertas,et al.  Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface quality, MRR and EW of WC–Co , 2004 .

[14]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Investigation for ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys , 2007 .

[15]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Neural and fuzzy model performance evaluation of a dynamic production system , 2006 .

[16]  Ajay Batish,et al.  Electric discharge machining of titanium and its alloys: a review , 2012 .

[17]  B. Turkovich,et al.  Tool wear in titanium machining , 1982 .

[18]  H. Zarepour,et al.  Statistical analysis on electrode wear in EDM of tool steel DIN 1.2714 used in forging dies , 2007 .

[19]  T. Masuzawa,et al.  An index to evaluate the wear resistance of the electrode in micro-EDM , 2004 .

[20]  A. Jawaid,et al.  The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti–6% Al–4% V , 2005 .

[21]  Rosemar Batista da Silva,et al.  Surface integrity of finished turned Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools using conventional and high pressure coolant supplies , 2007 .

[22]  Norliana Mohd Abbas,et al.  A review on current research trends in electrical discharge machining (EDM) , 2007 .

[23]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Determining optimal quality distribution of latex weight using adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling and control systems , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  R. Purohit,et al.  Mathematical modeling of electric discharge machining of cast Al-4Cu-6Si alloy-10wt.% SiCp composites , 2007 .

[25]  Pei-Jen Wang,et al.  Comparisons of neural network models on material removal rate in electrical discharge machining , 2001 .

[26]  Ulaş Çaydaş,et al.  Modeling and analysis of electrode wear and white layer thickness in die-sinking EDM process through response surface methodology , 2008 .

[27]  T. R. Bement,et al.  Taguchi techniques for quality engineering , 1995 .

[28]  C. F. Jeff Wu,et al.  Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2000 .

[29]  Xiang Li,et al.  Regularities in data from factorial experiments , 2006, Complex..

[30]  Hamdy A. Taha,et al.  Operations Research an Introduction , 2007 .

[31]  Pei-Jen Wang,et al.  Predictions on surface finish in electrical discharge machining based upon neural network models , 2001 .

[32]  Erik Vanhatalo,et al.  A Bayesian Analysis of Unreplicated Two-Level Factorials Using Effects Sparsity, Hierarchy, and Heredity , 2011 .

[33]  R. Cook.  Influential Observations in Linear Regression , 1979 .

[34]  Z. M. Wang,et al.  Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review , 1997 .

[35]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1967 .

[36]  Stephen T. Newman,et al.  State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM) , 2003 .

[37]  R. K. Bhoi,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Prediction of Material Removal Rate in Electro Discharge Machining , 2005 .

[38]  David K. Aspinwall,et al.  Creep feed grinding of gamma titanium aluminide and burn resistant titanium alloys using SiC abrasive , 2007 .

[39]  Osman Taylan,et al.  An adaptive neuro-fuzzy model for prediction of student's academic performance , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  J. O. Rawlings,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool , 1988 .

[41]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Bidirectional bridge between neural networks and linguistic knowledge: linguistic rule extraction and learning from linguistic rules , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[42]  C. Daniel.  Use of Half-Normal Plots in Interpreting Factorial Two-Level Experiments , 1959 .