On the effective behavior of nonlinear inelastic composites: II: A second-order procedure

A new method for determining the overall behavior of composite materials comprising nonlinear viscoelastic and elasto-viscoplastic constituents is presented. Part I of this work showed that upon use of an implicit time-discretization scheme, the evolution equations describing the constitutive behavior of the phases can be reduced to the minimization of an incremental energy function. This minimization problem is rigorously equivalent to a nonlinear thermoelastic problem with a transformation strain which is a nonuniform field (not even uniform within the phases). In part I of this paper the nonlinearity was handled using a variational (or secant) technique. In this second part of the study, a proper modification of the second-order procedure of Ponte Castaneda is proposed and leads to replacing, at each time-step, the actual nonlinear viscoelastic composite by a linear viscoelastic one. The linearized problem is even further simplified by using an “effective internal variable” in each individual phase. The resulting predictions are in good agreement with exact results and improve on the predictions of the secant model proposed in part I of this paper.

[1]  Pierre Suquet,et al.  Effective behavior of linear viscoelastic composites: A time-integration approach , 2007 .

[2]  Pedro Ponte Castañeda Exact second-order estimates for the effective mechanical properties of nonlinear composite materials , 1996 .

[3]  Hervé Moulinec,et al.  Intraphase strain heterogeneity in nonlinear composites: a computational approach , 2003 .

[4]  P. M. Naghdi,et al.  On continuum thermodynamics , 1972 .

[5]  P. Mialon Eléments d'analyse et de résolution numérique des relations de l'élasto-plasticité , 1986 .

[6]  R. Brenner,et al.  Improved affine estimates for nonlinear viscoelastic composites , 2005 .

[7]  Pedro Ponte Castañeda Second-order homogenization estimates for nonlinear composites incorporating field fluctuations: II—applications , 2002 .

[8]  P. Suquet,et al.  Small-contrast perturbation expansions for the effective properties of nonlinear composites , 1993 .

[9]  Hervé Moulinec,et al.  Macroscopic behavior and field fluctuations in viscoplastic composites: Second-order estimates versus full-field simulations , 2006 .

[10]  Philip Rabinowitz,et al.  Numerical methods for nonlinear algebraic equations , 1970 .

[11]  Pedro Ponte Castañeda Second-order homogenization estimates for nonlinear composites incorporating field fluctuations: I—theory , 2002 .

[12]  Renaud Masson,et al.  Self-consistent estimates for the rate-dependentelastoplastic behaviour of polycrystalline materials , 1999 .

[13]  Christian Miehe,et al.  Strain‐driven homogenization of inelastic microstructures and composites based on an incremental variational formulation , 2002 .

[14]  A. Zaoui,et al.  A methodology for an accurate evaluation of the linearization procedures in nonlinear mean field homogenization , 2005 .

[15]  Michel Bornert,et al.  An affine formulation for the prediction of the effective properties of nonlinear composites and polycrystals , 2000 .

[16]  Pierre Suquet,et al.  On the effective behavior of nonlinear inelastic composites: I. Incremental variational principles , 2007 .

[17]  M. Ortiz,et al.  The variational formulation of viscoplastic constitutive updates , 1999 .

[18]  K. Danas,et al.  Second-order theory for nonlinear composites and application to isotropic constituents , 2006 .

[19]  P. Suquet,et al.  Nonlinear composites: a linearization procedure, exact to second-order in contrast and for which the strain-energy and affine formulations coincide , 2004 .