Solving green supplier selection problem using q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based decision framework with unknown weight information

Abstract As a powerful generalization to intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) is proposed by Yager, which can effectively mitigate the weakness of IFS and provide wider space for preference elicitation. Based on the literature analysis on q-ROFS, a comprehensive decision framework for promoting rational decision-making is lacking. Motivated by the superiority of q-ROFS and to circumvent the issue, in this paper, a new decision framework with minimum subjective randomness is proposed under q-ROFS context. Initially, decision makers’ (DMs’) relative importance is systematically calculated by extending evidence-based Bayes approximation to q-ROFS. Later, a new operator is proposed for aggregating DMs’ preferences by extending generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean (GMSM) to q-ROFS context. Attributes’ weight values are calculated by using newly proposed q-rung orthopair fuzzy statistical variance (q-ROFSV) method and objects are prioritized by extending the popular VIKOR method to q-ROFS context. Finally, the practical use of the proposed decision framework is validated by using a green supplier selection problem and the strengths and weaknesses of the framework are discussed by using comparative analysis with other methods.

[1]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multiple attribute decision‐making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q‐rung orthopair fuzzy environment , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Fuzzy Decision Research During 1970–2015 , 2016, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Programming Method for Heterogeneous Multiattribute Group Decision Making With Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Truth Degrees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  Approximate reasoning with generalized orthopair fuzzy sets , 2017, Inf. Fusion.

[7]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[8]  Muhammet Gulź,et al.  A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications , 2016 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies based on a modified intuitionistic fuzzy topsis and trigonometric entropy weights , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[11]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A Comprehensive Literature Review of 50 Years of Fuzzy Set Theory , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Operations Research Approach , 1998 .

[13]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[15]  Runtong Zhang,et al.  Some Partitioned Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Based on q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information for Dealing with Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making , 2018, Symmetry.

[16]  Sen Liu,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Pankaj Gupta,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with an application to plant location selection based on a new extended VIKOR method , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[18]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications , 2016 .

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[24]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Hui Gao,et al.  Some q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[26]  Ali H. Diabat,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences , 2013 .

[27]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making Based on q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Power Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[28]  Özgür Kabak,et al.  Deriving decision makers' weights in group decision making: An overview of objective methods , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[29]  Runtong Zhang,et al.  A Novel Approach to Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making with q-Rung Picture Linguistic Information , 2018, Symmetry.

[30]  Peide Liu,et al.  Some q‐Rung Orthopai Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application to Multi‐Attribute Group Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[31]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for product development partner selection , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[32]  Xiaomin Zhu,et al.  Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Muirhead means with their application to multi-attribute group decision making , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[33]  Wen Sheng Du,et al.  Minkowski‐type distance measures for generalized orthopair fuzzy sets , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency of the fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..