Lacrosse equipment and cervical spinal cord space during immobilization: preliminary analysis.

CONTEXT Removal of the lacrosse helmet to achieve airway access has been discouraged based only on research in which cervical alignment was examined. No researchers have examined the effect of lacrosse equipment on the cervical space available for the spinal cord (SAC). OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of lacrosse equipment on the cervical SAC and cervical-thoracic angle (CTA) in the immobilized athlete. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Outpatient imaging center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Ten volunteer lacrosse athletes (age = 20.7 +/- 1.87 years, height = 180.3 +/- 8.3 cm, mass = 91 +/- 12.8 kg) with no history of cervical spine injury or disease and no contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). INTERVENTION(S) The lacrosse players were positioned supine on a spine board for all test conditions. An MRI scan was completed for each condition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The independent variables were condition (no equipment, shoulder pads only [SP], and full gear that included helmet and shoulder pads [FG]), and cervical spine level (C3-C7). The dependent variables were the SAC and CTA. The MRI scans were evaluated midsagittally. The average of 3 measures was used as the criterion variable. The SAC data were analyzed using a 3 x 5 analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures. The CTA data were analyzed with a 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS We found no equipment x level interaction effect (F(3.7,72) = 1.34, P = .279) or equipment main effect (F(2,18) = 1.20, P = .325) for the SAC (no equipment = 5.04 +/- 1.44 mm, SP = 4.69 +/- 1.36 mm, FG = 4.62 +/- 1.38 mm). The CTA was greater (ie, more extension; critical P = .0167) during the SP (32.64 degrees +/- 3.9 degrees) condition than during the no-equipment (25.34 degrees +/- 2.3 degrees ; t(9) = 7.67, P = .001) or FG (26.81 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees; t(9) = 4.80, P = .001) condition. CONCLUSIONS Immobilizing healthy lacrosse athletes with shoulder pads and no helmets affected cervical spine alignment but did not affect SAC. Further research is needed to determine and identify appropriate care of the lacrosse athlete with a spine injury.

[1]  M. Palumbo,et al.  The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  J. Kuhn,et al.  Cervical Spine Alignment in Immobilized Hockey Players: Radiographic Analysis With and Without Helmets and Shoulder Pads , 1998, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[3]  R. D. De Lorenzo,et al.  Optimal positioning for cervical immobilization. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  K. Waninger.  Management of the Helmeted Athlete with Suspected Cervical Spine Injury , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  J. Gastel,et al.  Emergency removal of football equipment: a cadaveric cervical spine injury model. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  R. LaPrade,et al.  Cervical Spine Alignment in the Immobilized Ice Hockey Player , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Cervical Spine Alignment in the Immobilized Football Player , 1997, American Journal of Sports Medicine.

[8]  R. Cantu,et al.  Fatalities and catastrophic injuries in high school and college sports, 1982-1997 lessons for improving safety. , 1999, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[9]  M. Palumbo,et al.  Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 1 , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  L. Decoster,et al.  Football Equipment Design Affects Face Mask Removal Efficiency , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  Shane V Caswell,et al.  Lacrosse Helmet Designs and the Effects of Impact Forces. , 2002, Journal of athletic training.

[12]  J. Richards,et al.  An Evaluation of Head Movement in Backboard-Immobilized Helmeted Football, Lacrosse, and Ice Hockey Players , 2001, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[13]  J. Hertel,et al.  The Effect of Protective Equipment on Cervical Spine Alignment in Collegiate Lacrosse Players , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  C. Maldjian,et al.  Head Position and Football Equipment Influence Cervical Spinal-Cord Space During Immobilization. , 2002, Journal of athletic training.

[15]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[16]  D. Reid,et al.  Position of the Cervical Vertebrae During Helmet Removal and Cervical Collar Application in Football and Hockey , 1995, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[17]  K. Guskiewicz,et al.  Management of cervical spine injuries in athletes. , 2007, Journal of athletic training.

[18]  D. Weinert,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of the Subarachnoid Space and Cervical Cord in Healthy Individuals Examined With Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1998, Spine.

[19]  Erik E Swartz,et al.  The influence of various factors on high school football helmet face mask removal: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. , 2007, Journal of athletic training.

[20]  W. Donaldson,et al.  Helmet and Shoulder Pad Removal in Suspected Cervical Spine Injury: Human Control Model , 2002, Spine.

[21]  D. Schriger,et al.  Spinal immobilization on a flat backboard: does it result in neutral position of the cervical spine? , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.