Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete mixes by the tri-linear model

The methods proposed by Elices and co-workers [1], [2] and [3] and by Hu and Wittmann [4] are commonly used to determine the size-independent specific fracture energy (GF) of concrete by correcting the size-dependent specific fracture energy (Gf) measured by the RILEM work-of-fracture method. In the boundary effect model of Hu and Wittmann [4], the change in the local fracture energy (gf) is approximated by a bilinear function, whereas the method of Elices et al. [1] consists in determining the non-measured work-of-fracture by adjusting the tail of the P-δ curve that corresponds to the final part of the test. Acoustic emission (AE) experiments on notched specimens (Muralidhara et al. [5] and [6]) have revealed that under loading the AE events follow approximately a tri-linear distribution; initially the number of events increases almost linearly reaching an extended plateau when the number of events remains nearly constant and eventually the number reduces as the crack approaches the back stress free boundary of the specimen, reminiscent of the development of R-curve in a finite size specimen. This paper exploits this observation and proposes a tri-linear model for the determination of the size-independent specific fracture energy for three different concrete mixes ranging in compressive strength from 57 to 122 MPa. Remarkably, it is found that the resulting size-independent specific fracture energy GF determined by this tri-linear model and by the bi-linear model of Hu and Wittmann [4] is very nearly the same and independent of the size of the specimen.

[1]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 3—influence of cutting theP-δ tail , 1992 .

[2]  N. Iyer,et al.  Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete mixes by two methods , 2013 .

[3]  Bing Chen,et al.  Experimental study on AE characteristics of three-point-bending concrete beams , 2004 .

[4]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  ANALYSIS OF WORK-OF-FRACTURE METHOD FOR MEASURING FRACTURE ENERGY OF CONCRETE , 1996 .

[5]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Influence of fracture process zone height on fracture energy of concrete , 2004 .

[6]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete , 2011 .

[7]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Fracture process zone size and true fracture energy of concrete using acoustic emission , 2010 .

[8]  A. Wolf,et al.  Secondary stresses induced by shear movement in structural glazing sealants , 1992 .

[9]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Damage investigation of single-edge notched beam tests with normal strength concrete and ultra high performance concrete specimens using acoustic emission techniques , 2012 .

[10]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 1—Influence of experimental procedures , 1992 .

[11]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete from three-point bend and wedge splitting tests , 2003 .

[12]  Sidney Mindess,et al.  The effect of specimen size on the fracture energy of concrete , 1984 .

[13]  R. Vidya Sagar,et al.  A review of recent developments in parametric based acoustic emission techniques applied to concrete structures , 2012 .

[14]  B. Prasad,et al.  Relationship between AE Energy and Fracture Energy of Plain Concrete Beams : Experimental Study , 2008 .

[15]  Rilem FMC 1 Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams , 1985 .

[16]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Size effects on concrete fracture energy: dimensional transition from order to disorder , 1996 .

[17]  R. K. Singh,et al.  Size-independent fracture energy in plain concrete beams using tri-linear model , 2011 .

[18]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Size effect: Influence of proximity of fracture process zone to specimen boundary , 2007 .

[19]  S. Niiseki,et al.  Influence of aggregate size on fracture process zone of concrete detected with three dimensional acoustic emission technique , 1991 .

[20]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Various size effects in fracture of concrete , 1985 .

[21]  Michael Forde,et al.  Assessing Damage of Reinforced Concrete Beam using b -value Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals , 2003 .

[22]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 2—Influence of bulk energy dissipation , 1992 .

[23]  Study of the Relationship between Concrete Fracture Energy and AE Signal Energy under Uniaxial Compression , 2012 .

[24]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Size dependence of concrete fracture energy determined by RILEM work-of-fracture method , 1991, International Journal of Fracture.

[25]  T. K. Koo,et al.  Acoustic emission from reinforced concrete beams , 1989 .

[26]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  A simple method for determining the true specific fracture energy of concrete , 2003 .

[27]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Fracture energy and fracture process zone , 1992 .

[28]  Yuşa Şahin,et al.  The influences of matrix and steel fibre tensile strengths on the fracture energy of high-strength concrete , 2011 .

[29]  E. Landis Micro–macro fracture relationships and acoustic emissions in concrete , 1999 .

[30]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Size effect on toughness induced by crack close to free surface , 2000 .