Radical Innovation in a Small Firm: A Hybrid Electric Vehicle Development Project at Volvo Cars

The potential paradigmatic shift in technology from the internal combustion engine to electric propulsion via hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) has been addressed by most automakers, and has produced very different outcomes. This paper uses the framework of core capabilities to discuss how the small automaker, Volvo Cars, made substantial progress in its HEV development using an approach based on limited resources and a low risk. A comparison with Toyota's successful but very resource-demanding Prius project reveals some factors contributing towards rapid development in a context of limited resources, including focused project objectives, tight collaboration with suppliers of the new technologies, reuse of existing technologies and an unaggressive, bottom-up approach to change the firm's values and norms and other core capability dimensions. This paper provides an empirical illustration of how a small company in a mature industry worked with radical innovation in a development project drawing on the combination of organizational slack, entrepreneurial employees and an extensive use of external (knowledge) suppliers.

[1]  James F. Doyle,et al.  Radical Innovation: how mature companies can outsmart upstarts , 2001, UBIQ.

[2]  G. Hayward.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change , 1998 .

[3]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[4]  Technical Systems,et al.  COMMISSION ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies , 1998 .

[7]  F. Olleros.  Emerging Industries and the Burnout of Pioneers , 1986 .

[8]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[9]  Anurag Sharma,et al.  Central Dilemmas of Managing Innovation in Large Firms , 1999 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technology Cycles, Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizations , 1997 .

[12]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[14]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  How new product strategies impact on performance , 1984 .

[15]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[16]  Maria Backman,et al.  Working With Concepts in the Fuzzy Front End: Exploring the Context for Innovation for Different Types of Concepts at Volvo Cars , 2007 .

[17]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Environmental innovation in auto development - managing technological uncertainty within strict time limits , 2001 .

[18]  Mats Williander,et al.  Absorptive capacity and interpretation system's impact when ‘going green’: an empirical study of ford, volvo cars and toyota , 2007 .

[19]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[20]  M. Assink.  Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model , 2006 .

[21]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[22]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[23]  Peter Gwynne,et al.  Skunk Works, 1990s-Style , 1997 .

[24]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[25]  Subodh P. Kulkarni,et al.  Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal , 1998 .

[26]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[27]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[28]  M. Elmquist.  Vehicles for Innovation and Learning: The Case of a Neglected Concept Car Project , 2007 .

[29]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[30]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[31]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Innovation: the classic traps. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[32]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization , 2004 .

[33]  Hans M Pohl,et al.  INTERPARADIGMATIC HYBRIDS: A NEW THEORETICAL CONCEPT WHEN ADDRESSING PARADIGMATIC SHIFTS IN TECHNOLOGY , 2010 .

[34]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[35]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[36]  Maria Elmquist.  Enabling Innovation: Exploring the prerequisites for innovative concepts in R&D , 2007 .

[37]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[38]  武石 彰,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor : the case of automotive product development , 1999 .

[39]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[40]  Richard DeMartino,et al.  Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms, Journal of Product , 2006 .