Comprehensive time-resolved MRI of peripheral vascular malformations.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI and MR angiography for the assessment of peripheral vascular malformations compared with the usefulness of conventional duplex sonography, venography, and arteriography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients (age range, 8-64 years; 11 males and eight females) with clinically diagnosed or suspected angiodyplastic abnormalities of the extremities were examined on a 1.5-T whole-body MR scanner. Using parameters based on a fast localizer sequence, we acquired transverse or coronal T1-, T2-, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo MRIs were acquired to determine the extent and type of the arteriovenous malformation for each patient. MR data sets were evaluated for lesion depiction, determination of the extent of the malformation, involvement of neighboring structures, vascular detail, and treatment planning. Results were compared with findings from duplex sonography, venography, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS All MRIs were of diagnostic quality and revealed 12 venous vascular malformations, four arteriovenous malformations, and three hemangiomas. The STIR sequence was helpful for determining the extent of the vascular malformation, which was often underestimated using contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography alone, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography was required for classifying the type of the lesion. MR angiography was inferior to conventional angiography for revealing vascular detail and for planning intervention. CONCLUSION MRI and MR angiography appear to be valuable for the assessment of vascular malformations of the extremities. The protocol for imaging such malformations should combine dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI with STIR sequences. However, digital subtraction angiography and venography are still required for definitive treatment decisions.

[1]  J. Disa,et al.  Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Evaluation of Vascular Malformations of the Hand , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Debatin,et al.  Management of congenital angiodysplasia of the lower limb: magnetic resonance imaging and angiography versus conventional angiography. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  W. Dillon,et al.  Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck: MR characterization. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Biological classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies: MR correlation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Molecular genetics of vascular malformations. , 2001, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[6]  K. Kurisu,et al.  Usefulness of three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography on arteriovenous malformations , 2005, Neurosurgical review.

[7]  Y. Watson,et al.  MR angiography and MR imaging of symptomatic vascular malformations. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[8]  A. Puglionisi,et al.  Congenital angiodysplasias of the extremities. II. Arterial, arterial and venous, and haemolymphatic dysplasias. , 1965, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  P. Causer,et al.  Venous vascular malformations in pediatric patients: comparison of results of alcohol sclerotherapy with proposed MR imaging classification. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Phase-contrast MR angiography of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[11]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[12]  A. Stavros,et al.  MR imaging of symptomatic peripheral vascular malformations. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  D. Adams,et al.  Vascular malformations and hemangiomas: a practical approach in a multidisciplinary clinic. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  L. Garel,et al.  Imaging of hemangiomas and vascular malformations in children. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[15]  M V Knopp,et al.  Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Strategies for timing and contrast media injection: original investigation. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[16]  J. Weinreb,et al.  Arteriovenous malformations of the extremities: MR imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[17]  R. Hennekam,et al.  Progress toward understanding vascular malformations. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  G. Sebag,et al.  Soft-tissue venous malformations in children: percutaneous sclerotherapy with Ethibloc. , 1991, Radiology.

[19]  L. Garel,et al.  Soft-tissue hemangiomas in infants and children: diagnosis using Doppler sonography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  T. Staple,et al.  Radiology of Angiodysplasien of the Limb1 , 1974 .

[21]  P. Strouse,et al.  MR imaging differentiation of soft-tissue hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  K. Kurisu,et al.  Usefulness of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography combined with surface anatomy scanning for convexity lesions , 2005, Neurosurgical review.