Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value

Despite the importance to researchers, managers, and policy makers of how information technology (IT) contributes to organizational performance, there is uncertainty and debate about what we know and don't know. A review of the literature reveals that studies examining the association between information technology and organizational performance are divergent in how they conceptualize key constructs and their interrelationships. We develop a model of IT business value based on the resource-based view of the firm that integrates the various strands of research into a single framework. We apply the integrative model to synthesize what is known about IT business value and guide future research by developing propositions and suggesting a research agenda. A principal finding is that IT is valuable, but the extent and dimensions are dependent upon internal and external factors, including complementary organizational resources of the firm and its trading partners, as well as the competitive and macro environment. Our analysis provides a blueprint to guide future research and facilitate knowledge accumulation and creation concerning the organizational performance impacts of information technology.

[1]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[2]  Kevin J. Stiroh,et al.  Investing in Information Technology: Productivity Payoffs for U.S. Industries , 2005 .

[3]  Robert W. Blanning,et al.  Synthesis and Decomposition of Processes in Organizations , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Daniel E. Sichel,et al.  Growth of US Industries and Investments in Information Technology and Higher Education , 2003 .

[5]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  John M. Ward,et al.  Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence , 2003, CSUR.

[12]  K. Horton Strategy, practice, and the dynamics of power , 2003 .

[13]  Eric Brousseau,et al.  E-Commerce in France: Did Early Adoption Prevent Its Development? , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[14]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[15]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  Ilias P. Tatsiopoulos,et al.  REALIZATION OF THE VIRTUAL ENTERPRISE PARADIGM IN THE CLOTHING INDUSTRY THROUGH E‐BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY , 2002 .

[17]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry , 2002 .

[19]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[21]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[22]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[24]  Andrew P. McAfee THE IMPACT OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 2002 .

[25]  Rita Tehan,et al.  E-Commerce Statistics: Explanation and Sources , 2002 .

[26]  Frank T. Magiera,et al.  International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: Recent Developments , 2002 .

[27]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence , 2002 .

[28]  Hans Oppelland,et al.  A socio political model of the relationship between IT investments and business performance , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Mike W. Peng The resource-based view and international business: , 2001 .

[30]  R. Watson,et al.  Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  M. Hammer,et al.  The superefficient company. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[32]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Public Policy and Innovative Capabilities: The Case of Philips' IT Activities , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  P. Tigre,et al.  Brazil Meets the Global Challenge: IT Policy in a Postliberalization Environment , 2001 .

[35]  Varun Grover,et al.  Research Report: A Reexamination of IT Investment and the Market Value of the Firm - An Event Study Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  The Evolution of EDI for Competitive Advantage: The Fedex Case , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[37]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[38]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy At First American Corporation , 2000, MIS Q..

[39]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[40]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[41]  Bruce R. Barringer,et al.  Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships , 2000 .

[42]  K. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: Evidence from Country-Level Data , 2000 .

[43]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Strategic Payoff from EDI as a Function of EDI Embeddedness , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy , 2000 .

[47]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[48]  Yolande E. Chan IT Value: The Great Divide Between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  M. Unitt,et al.  EDI — The Grand Daddy of Electronic Commerce , 1999 .

[50]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[51]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Refining and Extending the Business Model with Information Technology: Dell Computer Corporation , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[52]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Information Technology and Growth , 1999 .

[53]  J. Triplett The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? , 1999 .

[54]  Bill Lehr,et al.  Information technology and its impact on firm-level productivity: evidence from government and private data sources, 1977-1993 , 1999 .

[55]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Edmond P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding “IS business value”: derivation of dimensions , 1999 .

[57]  Toru Maegawa,et al.  The Internet in the United States , 1998 .

[58]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[59]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[60]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Information Technology and Worker Composition: Determinants of Productivity in the Life Insurance Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[61]  Kevin J. Stiroh,et al.  Computers, Productivity, and Input Substitution , 1998 .

[62]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The intangible benefits and costs of investments: evidence from financial markets , 1997, ICIS '97.

[64]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[65]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Information Technology and Internal Firm Organization: An Exploratory Analysis , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[67]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[68]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[69]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[70]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  D. Siegel The Impact of Computers on Manufacturing Productivity Growth: A Multiple-Indicators, Multiple-Causes Approach , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[72]  Erik Brynjolfsson The Contribution of Information Technology to Consumer Welfare , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability , 1996 .

[74]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[75]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Ownership and Investment in Electronic Networks , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[76]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[77]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[78]  J. Dunning Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism , 1995 .

[79]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[80]  Robert M. Brown,et al.  Strategic Information Systems and Financial Performance , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[82]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[84]  Varun Grover,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance , 1994, MIS Q..

[85]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  A Multimedia Solution to Productivity Gridlock: A Re-Engineered Jewelry Appraisal System at Zale Corporation , 1994, MIS Q..

[86]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[87]  F. Lichtenberg The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm- Level Analysis , 1993 .

[88]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Limits to Interfirm Coordination through Information Technology: Results of a Field Study in Consumer Packaged Goods Distribution , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[90]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[91]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[92]  Robin Fincham,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON POWER: PROCESSUAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND ‘INTERNAL’FORMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL POWER , 1992 .

[93]  P. Chang,et al.  Computerized reservation systems , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[94]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  An economic analysis of interorganizational information technology , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[95]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Corporate strategies for information technology: a resource-based approach , 1991, Computer.

[96]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces , 1991, MIS Q..

[97]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[98]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information Technology at Rosenbluth Travel: Competitive Advantage in a Rapidly Growing Global Service Company , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[99]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[100]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Beating Murphy's Law , 1991 .

[101]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[102]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[103]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  TELCOT: An Application of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage in the Cotton Industry , 1990, MIS Q..

[104]  M. Morton,et al.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[105]  Paul Alpar,et al.  A Microeconomic Approach to the Measurement of Information Technology Value , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[106]  Max D. Hopper Rattling SABRE—new ways to compete on information , 1990 .

[107]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[108]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Concentra tion-Performance Relationship: Aggregating Findings in Strategic Management , 1989 .

[109]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment , 1989, ICIS '89.

[110]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  McKesson Drug Company: A Case Study of Economost - A Strategic Information System , 1988, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[111]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[112]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Strategic Contributions of Information Technology: An Empirical Study of Atm Networks , 1988, ICIS.

[113]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Modeling and Measuring the Business Value of Information Technology , 1988 .

[114]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[115]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[116]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[117]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[118]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[119]  K. Clark,et al.  Unionization and Firm Performance: The Impact on Profits, Growth and Productivity , 1982 .

[120]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[121]  W. Dutton,et al.  The Interests Served B Y Technological Reform , 1979 .

[122]  F. Edwards,et al.  Managerial Objectives in Regulated Industries: Expense-Preference Behavior in Banking , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[123]  W. Primeaux,et al.  An Assessment of X-Efficiency Gained through Competition , 1977 .

[124]  Joan V. Robinson Economics of imperfect competition , 1969 .

[125]  W. Hogan,et al.  A THEORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE FIRM , 1961 .

[126]  Joe S. Bain,et al.  Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940 , 1951 .

[127]  E. Chamberlin,et al.  Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition , 1937 .

[128]  Joan Robinson,et al.  The Economics of Imperfect Competition. , 1933 .

[129]  E. Chamberlin The Theory of Monopolistic Competition , 1933 .

[130]  R. Rumelt Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[131]  L.,et al.  THE INTERESTS SERVED B Y TECHNOLOGICAL REFORM The Case of Computing , 2005 .

[132]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  In Search of Information Technology Business Value: Do Measurement Levels Make a Difference? , 2003, AMCIS.

[133]  Edmond P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Constructing a Theory of 'IS Business Value' from the Literature , 2002 .

[134]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  A Meta-analytic Review , 2002 .

[135]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[136]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The Effects of Firm Characteristics on Investor Reaction to IT Investment Announcements , 2001, ICIS.

[137]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Oligopolistic competition, IT use for product differentiation, and the productivity paradox , 2001 .

[138]  A. Barua,et al.  An Integrated Assessment of Productivity and Efficiency Impacts of Information Technology Investments: Old Data, New Analysis and Evidence , 1999 .

[139]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  Linking IT use to benefits in interorganizational networks: the mediating role of relationship-specific intangible investments , 1999, ICIS.

[140]  John Fahy,et al.  Strategic Marketing and the Resource Based View of the Firm , 1999 .

[141]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investments on Firm Performance and Evaluation: Evidence from Newly Industrialized Economies , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[142]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Matrix of Change , 1997 .

[143]  P. Weill,et al.  Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures , 1997 .

[144]  C. Morrison Assessing the Productivity of Information Technology Equipment in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1991, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[145]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[146]  L. Röller,et al.  Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: a Simultaneous Approach Forschungsschwerpunkt Marktprozeß Und Unter- Nehmensentwicklung Research Area Market Processes and Corporate Development Abstract Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: a Simultaneous Approach * , 1996 .

[147]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[148]  Diane D. Wilson,et al.  It Investment and its Productivity Effects: An Organizational Sociologist's Perspective on Directions for Future Research , 1995 .

[149]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  An empirical study of the business value of the U.S. airlines' computerized reservations systems , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[150]  S. Paul,et al.  The Impact Of Technology Adoption On Firm Productivity , 1995 .

[151]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[152]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms , 1995 .

[153]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[154]  P. Weill,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INVESTMENT IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A STUDY OF THE VALVE MANUFACTURING SECTOR , 1992 .

[155]  M. Paul,et al.  Assessing the Productivity of Information Technology Equipment in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1991 .

[156]  T. Roehl,et al.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[157]  J. Barney Organisational Culture: Can It Be Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1986 .

[158]  T. Bresnahan Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers inFinancial Services , 1986 .

[159]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[160]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[161]  R. Rumelt Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[162]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[163]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[164]  Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors , 1980 .

[165]  Hurvey Leibenstein Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .

[166]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .