A simplified formulation of predictive object points (POP) sizing metric for OO measurement

Different effort estimation techniques exist for sizing software systems but none is directly applicable to object-oriented software. Although many researchers worked for size and thus effort estimation but still the problem not resolved fully. Different existing estimation techniques works specifically for specific development environment. PRICE systems has developed the predictive object point (POP) metric for predicting effort required for developing an object oriented software system and is based on the counting scheme of function point (FP) method. Though it was an interesting theoretical development but could not gain sufficient recognition from practitioners to be used on a regular basis due to lack of an easy to use support tool and too much complicated formulations. In this paper we tried to simplify the POP calculation. The POP count formula suggested by PRICE system has been modified for estimating the effort. An easy to use support tool to automate the counting method has been prepared. The refined POP count formula and preliminary results of its application in an industrial environment are presented and discussed here for validation of the suggested modification or simplification in formula.

[1]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Comparing Complexity in Accordance with Object Oriented Metrics , 2011 .

[2]  Mark Lorenz,et al.  Object-oriented software metrics - a practical guide , 1994 .

[3]  Jana Polgar,et al.  Object-Oriented Software Metrics , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[4]  David F. Rico Software Process Improvement , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design , 2015, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[6]  Alain Abran,et al.  Software Metrics and Software Metrology: Abran/Software Metrics , 2010 .

[7]  R. Fiutem,et al.  Definition and experimental evaluation of function points for object-oriented systems , 1998, Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262).

[8]  BoehmBarry,et al.  Software development cost estimation approaches A survey , 2000 .

[9]  E. W. Olsen,et al.  Software Process Improvement: Metrics, Measurement, and Process Modelling , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[10]  Dimitris Christodoulakis,et al.  OBJECT-ORIENTED METRICS - A SURVEY , 2000 .

[11]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Object-Oriented Metrics , 1993, TOOLS.

[12]  C. Ravindranath Pandian Software Metrics: A Guide to Planning, Analysis, and Application , 2003 .

[13]  Paul Goodman Software Metrics: Best Practices for Successful IT Management , 2004 .

[14]  N SanthoshKumar,et al.  OBJECT ORIENTED METRICS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT , 2015 .

[15]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Software-Effort Estimation: An Exploratory Study of Expert Performance , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Alain Abran,et al.  From software metrics to software measurement methods: a process model , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards.