Democracy and the policy sciences

The policy sciences approach has recently came under sustained criticism for being insensitive to the values and preferences of the ordinary citizen. This paper attempts to address these problems by outlining a post-positivist approach, drawing upon the works of Jurgen Habermas. The paper proposes a “participatory policy analysis” that utilizes a sampling of affected citizens to create a “policy forum” to inform the policymaker of citizens' positions on important policy issues.

[1]  Erica Baum.  When the witch doctors agree: The family support act and social science research , 1991 .

[2]  R. Denhardt,et al.  Toward a Critical Theory of Public Organization , 1981 .

[3]  J. Dryzek.  Policy Sciences of Democracy , 1989, Polity.

[4]  Peter deLeon,et al.  Participatory Policy Analysis: Prescriptions and Precautions , 1990 .

[5]  Dan Durning,et al.  Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study , 1993 .

[6]  John Robinson.  Apples and horned toads: On the framework-determined nature of the energy debate , 1982 .

[7]  J. Johnson.  Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation between Critical Theory and Rational Choice , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[8]  H. Jenkins-Smith,et al.  Analytical debates and policy learning: analysis and change in the federal bureaucracy , 1988 .

[9]  Frank Fischer.  BEYOND THE RATIONALITY PROJECT: POLICY ANALYSIS AND THE POSTPOSITIVE CHALLENGE , 1989 .

[10]  Frank N. Laird,et al.  Technocracy revisited: knowledge, power and the crisis in energy decision making , 1990 .

[11]  M. Thompson.  Among the Energy Tribes: A cultural framework for the analysis and design of energy policy , 1984 .

[12]  Lyn Kathlene,et al.  Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation , 1991 .

[13]  Douglas Torgerson.  Interpretive policy inquiry: A response to its limitations , 1986 .

[14]  The Federal Courts and Nonprofit Administration , 1993 .

[15]  C. Lindblom.  Who Needs What Social Research for Policymaking? , 1986 .

[16]  Douglas Torgerson.  Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell , 1985 .

[17]  D. Amy.  Why policy analysis and ethics are incompatible , 1984 .

[18]  Steven Maynard-Moody,et al.  Policy Analysis in the Post-Positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development Districts Program , 1993 .

[19]  Peter L. Szanton.  The remarkable quango: Knowledge, politics, and walfare reform , 1991 .

[20]  P. Deleon.  The Democratization of the Policy Sciences , 1992 .

[21]  Martin Rein,et al.  Value-Critical Policy Analysis , 1983 .

[22]  L. deLeon.  As Plain as 1, 2, 3...and 4 , 1993 .

[23]  W. Ascher.  Editorial: Policy sciences and the economic approach in a ‘post-positivist’ era , 1987 .