Ultrasound detection of submerged dental implants through soft tissue in a porcine model.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Current methods of measuring soft tissue thickness over potential dental implant sites and locating submerged implants may be imprecise or invasive. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop and demonstrate proof of the concept of a customized ultrasound imaging system in locating and measuring the depth of implants submerged beneath soft tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS A complete ultrasound system, including a customized soft tissue-matched transducer, transceiver, and digital signal processing algorithms, was created for the specific application of detecting dental implants anchored in bone beneath soft tissue. The system was used to locate implants placed in cancellous bone and measure overlying soft tissue depth in a porcine model. Ten measurements were made on each porcine model by manually moving the transducer laterally over the soft tissue surface. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS The mean signal-to-noise ratio, SNR (standard deviation), from the bone surfaces, was 19.1 (4.6) dB, and the mean SNR from the implant surfaces was 36.6 (2.2) dB, resulting in a mean difference of 17.5 dB, or x56.2, in average signal power between the bone and implant surfaces. Consequently, implants were easily and accurately (+/-0.2 mm) located beneath at least 5 mm of soft tissue. Likewise, soft tissue depths over bone and implants were accurately measured and were within the corresponding caliper tissue measurement error (+/-0.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS The specialized ultrasound imaging system located and measured the depth of implants placed in bone submerged beneath soft tissue in a porcine model.

[1]  R R Neurgaonkar,et al.  Ultrasound crack detection in a simulated human tooth. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2]  E. Cotti,et al.  Echographic evaluation of bone lesions of endodontic origin: report of two cases in the same patient. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  G. Puddu,et al.  A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[5]  G. Armitage,et al.  Clinical evaluation of periodontal diseases. , 1995, Periodontology 2000.

[6]  H. Spranger Ultra-sonic diagnosis of marginal periodontal diseases. , 1971, International dental journal.

[7]  Wenwu Cao,et al.  High frequency properties of passive materials for ultrasonic transducers , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Henriette Lerner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Preservation of the Periimplant Marginal Bone , 2007, Implant dentistry.

[9]  D. L. Hykes,et al.  Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation , 1985 .

[10]  Daly Ch,et al.  The use of ultra-sonic thickness measurement in the clinical evaluation of the oral soft tissues. , 1971 .

[11]  C. Löst,et al.  Ultrasonic B-scans of the facial/oral periodontium in pigs. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  M E Palou,et al.  The use of ultrasound for the determination of periodontal bone morphology. , 1987, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  B. Savitha,et al.  Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method. , 2005, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[14]  R.W. Martin,et al.  Dual layer matching (20 MHz) piezoelectric transducers with glass and parylene , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  C. Löst,et al.  Determination of the facial/oral alveolar crest using RF-echograms. An in vitro study on the periodontium of pigs. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  Robert N. McDonough,et al.  Detection of signals in noise , 1971 .

[17]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  Thomas L. Szabo,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out , 2004 .

[19]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  R. Ambu,et al.  Ultrasound real-time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[21]  W L Kydd,et al.  The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. , 1971, International dental journal.

[22]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Thickness of masticatory mucosa. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  Gaetano Marenzi,et al.  Aesthetics in Oral Implantology: Biological, Clinical, Surgical, and Prosthetic Aspects , 2007, Implant dentistry.