Customized Orthogonal Locality Preserving Projections With Soft-Margin Maximization for Face Recognition

Face recognition still is a challenging task since face images may be affected by changes in the scene, such as in head pose, face expression, or illumination. In addition, face pattern representation often requires several dimensions, which poses additional challenges for face recognition. We propose a novel face recognition method based on projections of high-dimensional face image representations into lower dimensionality and highly discriminative spaces. This is achieved by a modified orthogonal locality preserving projection (OLPP) method that uses a customized locality definition scheme to preserve the face class structure in the lower dimensionality face feature space. The proposed method can work with sparse and dense face image representations (i.e., it can use subsets or all face image pixels) and tends to be robust to data outliers and noise. Besides, we introduce a sparse representation using interpolated landmarks, designed to preserve important details in high-resolution color face images (e.g., eyes), and compensate for uncertainties in landmark positioning during face image feature extraction. The face images are classified in this lower dimensionality feature space using a trained soft-margin support vector machine, so it performs better than the nearest neighbor rule used in the typical OLPP method. A set of experiments was designed to evaluate the proposed scheme under various conditions found in practice (such as changes in head pose, face expression, illumination, and in the presence of occlusion artifacts). The experimental results were obtained using five challenging public face databases (namely, Poznan University of Technology, Fundação Educacional Inaciana, Facial Recognition Technology, Yale, and Our Database of Faces). These experiments suggest that our sparse representation for high-resolution face color images, integrated to the proposed lower dimensionality feature space and classification scheme, tends to obtain higher accuracy values than those obtained using typical sparse and dense representations for the same face images in grayscale. To evaluate the generality of our lower dimensionality feature space and classification scheme, additional tests using full low-resolution grayscale face images were performed, as often used in face recognition (e.g., typical OLPP method). Our experiments suggest that the proposed approach can also provide higher accuracy values than comparable state-of-the-art methods available in the literature when using full low-resolution grayscale face images (i.e., dense representations).

[1]  C. Thomaz,et al.  A new ranking method for principal components analysis and its application to face image analysis , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[2]  Jacob Scharcanski,et al.  Signal and Image Processing for Biometrics , 2014 .

[3]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Age Estimation and Face Verification Across Aging Using Landmarks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[4]  Raghunath S. Holambe,et al.  Half-Iris Feature Extraction and Recognition Using a New Class of Biorthogonal Triplet Half-Band Filter Bank and Flexible k-out-of-n:A Postclassifier , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[6]  Shiguang Shan,et al.  Multi-View Discriminant Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[8]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[9]  Hee-seung Choi,et al.  Recognizable-Image Selection for Fingerprint Recognition With a Mobile-Device Camera , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[10]  Yi Shen,et al.  Optimized Ensemble EMD-Based Spectral Features for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[12]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[13]  Shiguang Shan,et al.  Context constrained facial landmark localization based on discontinuous Haar-like feature , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[14]  Geert Verdoolaege,et al.  Data and Information Dimensionality in Non-cooperative Face Recognition , 2014 .

[15]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Scholkopf,et al.  Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels , 1999, Neural Networks for Signal Processing IX: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8468).

[17]  Yun Fu,et al.  A study on automatic age estimation using a large database , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Robust Face Landmark Estimation under Occlusion , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Jacob Scharcanski,et al.  Enhancing the Performance of Active Shape Models in Face Recognition Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[20]  G. Baudat,et al.  Generalized Discriminant Analysis Using a Kernel Approach , 2000, Neural Computation.

[21]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Speed up kernel discriminant analysis , 2011, The VLDB Journal.

[22]  Alfredo Paolillo,et al.  Face Based Recognition Algorithms: A First Step Toward a Metrological Characterization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  Adam Schmidt,et al.  The put face database , 2008 .

[24]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[25]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[26]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Active Shape Models with Invariant Optimal Features: Application to Facial Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Supervised Subspace Learning with Multi-class Lagrangian SVM on the Grassmann Manifold , 2011, Australasian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[28]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[29]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Orthogonal Laplacianfaces for Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Yuxiao Hu,et al.  Face recognition using Laplacianfaces , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  Hongjun Jia,et al.  Support Vector Machines in face recognition with occlusions , 2009, CVPR.

[32]  David Zhang,et al.  Selecting a Reference High Resolution for Fingerprint Recognition Using Minutiae and Pores , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[33]  László Györfi,et al.  A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition , 1996, Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability.

[34]  Junsong Yuan,et al.  Robust Part-Based Hand Gesture Recognition Using Kinect Sensor , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[35]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Working Set Selection Using Second Order Information for Training Support Vector Machines , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Nicolas D. Georganas,et al.  Real-Time Hand Gesture Detection and Recognition Using Bag-of-Features and Support Vector Machine Techniques , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[37]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Pose invariant facial component-landmark detection , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[38]  Ulrich H.-G. Kreßel,et al.  Pairwise classification and support vector machines , 1999 .

[39]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[40]  Xiaolong Wang,et al.  Kinship Measurement on Salient Facial Features , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.