Paradigms of plasmid organization

Plasmids are extrachromosomal elements built from a selection of generally quite well understood survival and propagation functions, including replication, partitioning, multimer resolution, post‐segregational killing and conjugative transfer. Evolution has favoured clustering of these modules to form plasmid cores or backbones. Co‐regulation of these core genes can also provide advantages that favour retention of the backbone organization. Tumour‐inducing and symbiosis‐determining plasmids appear to co‐regulate replication and transfer in response to cell density, both being stimulated at high density. Broad‐host‐range plasmids of the IncP‐1 group, on the other hand, have autogenous control circuits, which allow a burst of expression during establishment in a new host, but a minimum of expression during maintenance. The lessons that plasmids have for clustering and co‐regulation may explain the logic and organization of many small bacterial genomes currently being investigated.

[1]  S. Haake,et al.  Native Plasmids of Fusobacterium nucleatum: Characterization and Use in Development of Genetic Systems , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  J. Young,et al.  Diversity of repC plasmid-replication sequences in Rhizobium leguminosarum. , 1996, Microbiology.

[3]  S. Farrand,et al.  The Replicator of the Nopaline-Type Ti Plasmid pTiC58 Is a Member of the repABC Family and Is Influenced by the TraR-Dependent Quorum-Sensing Regulatory System , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  G. Fitzgerald,et al.  Identification and Characterization of an Active Plasmid Partition Mechanism for the Novel Lactococcus lactisPlasmid pCI2000 , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  A. Bairoch,et al.  Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes , 1997, Nature.

[6]  F. Khanim,et al.  Repression at a distance by the global regulator KorB of promiscuous IncP plasmids , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  Complete Nucleotide Sequence of Birmingham IncPα Plasmids: Compilation and Comparative Analysis , 1994 .

[8]  A. Rosenthal,et al.  High‐resolution transcriptional analysis of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  IncC of Broad-Host-Range Plasmid RK2 Modulates KorB Transcriptional Repressor Activity In Vivo and Operator Binding In Vitro , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  R. B. Jensen,et al.  Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  Complete sequence of the IncPbeta plasmid R751: implications for evolution and organisation of the IncP backbone. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  M Zatyka,et al.  Control of genes for conjugative transfer of plasmids and other mobile elements. , 1998, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  S. Khan,et al.  Plasmid rolling‐circle replication: recent developments , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  J. Young,et al.  Distribution of repC plasmid-replication sequences among plasmids and isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae from field populations. , 1998, Microbiology.

[15]  G. del Solar,et al.  Plasmid copy number control: an ever‐growing story , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  D. Chattoraj,et al.  Control of plasmid DNA replication by iterons: no longer paradoxical , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  R. B. Jensen,et al.  Comparison of ccd of F, parDE of RP4, and parD of R1 using a novel conditional replication control system of plasmid R1 , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  Conserved C-terminal region of global repressor KorA of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 is required for co-operativity between KorA and a second RK2 global regulator, KorB. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  R. B. Jensen,et al.  Programmed cell death in bacteria: proteic plasmid stabilization systems , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  The replication and stable-inheritance functions of IncP-9 plasmid pM3. , 2000, Microbiology.

[21]  I. Kobayashi Selfishness and death: raison d'être of restriction, recombination and mitochondria. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  Christopher M. Thomas Conjugative-DNA Transfer Processes , 2000 .

[23]  A. Gultyaev,et al.  Antisense RNA-regulated programmed cell death. , 1997, Annual review of genetics.

[24]  D. Bartosik,et al.  Molecular and functional analysis of pTAV320, a repABC-type replicon of the Paracoccus versutus composite plasmid pTAV1. , 1998, Microbiology.

[25]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Stability by multimer resolution of pJHCMW1 is due to the Tn1331 resolvase and not to the Escherichia coli Xer system. , 2000, Microbiology.

[26]  Manuel Espinosa,et al.  Plasmids Replication and Control of Circular Bacterial , 1998 .

[27]  J. Alonso,et al.  Plasmid copy-number control and better-than-random segregation genes of pSM19035 share a common regulator. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  Effect of growth rate and incC mutation on symmetric plasmid distribution by the IncP‐1 partitioning apparatus , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Two related recombinases are required for site-specific recombination at dif and cer in E. coli K12 , 1993, Cell.

[30]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  KorA protein of promiscuous plasmid RK2 controls a transcriptional switch between divergent operons for plasmid replication and conjugative transfer. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Picardeau,et al.  Analysis of the internal replication region of a mycobacterial linear plasmid. , 2000, Microbiology.

[32]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  The hierarchy of KorB binding at its 12 binding sites on the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 and modulation of this binding by IncC1 protein. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.