Experience curve analysis on South Korean nuclear technology and comparative analysis with South Korean renewable technologies

Increasing awareness on environmental damage and climate change has induced many nations to engage in green growth. South Korea, as one of the largest consumers of energy, is no exception and has shown its determination to pursue green growth in the future. In order to do so, South Korea plans to substitute fossil fuel with alternative sources in electricity generation. However, the key constraint to green growth is the high cost faced by renewable electricity generation. Fortunately, nuclear energy can serve as an economic alternative to fossil fuel. To achieve CO2 emission reduction and faster economic growth, it is wise to analyze prospects of alternatives using experience curve framework. The results and industry background are consistent for nuclear technology, and the results suggest that nuclear should serve as the main substitute. Consideration of policy risk inherent in renewable also strengthens the argument. Renewable technologies, on the other hand, showed overstated learning capacity that is partially inconsistent with technological background. Nevertheless, the renewable (photovoltaic and fuel cell22Although it may seem peculiar to many readers, this classification is based on Korean Government and Korean Power Exchange's classification. They classify fuel cell as a renewable energy source.) should help nuclear marginally in substituting fossil fuel in South Korea's Electricity Generation.

[1]  F. Ferioli,et al.  Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis , 2009 .

[2]  B. Brand,et al.  The renewable energy targets of the Maghreb countries: Impact on electricity supply and conventional power markets , 2010 .

[3]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[4]  Gento Mogi,et al.  The competitiveness of Korea as a developer of hydrogen energy technology: The AHP approach , 2008 .

[5]  J. Keppler,et al.  Projected Costs of Generating Electricity : 2010 Edition , 2010 .

[6]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[7]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Technology S-Curves in Renewable Energy Alternatives: Analysis and Implications for Industry and Government. , 2009 .

[8]  W.G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  Potential errors when fitting experience curves by means of spreadsheet software , 2010 .

[9]  Alexandre Szklo,et al.  Future electric power technology choices of Brazil:: a possible conflict between local pollution and global climate change , 2001 .

[10]  Hojeong Park,et al.  Valuation of marginal CO2 abatement options for electric power plants in Korea , 2009 .

[11]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[12]  G. Hall,et al.  The experience curve from the economist's perspective , 1985 .

[13]  Hiromi Yamamoto,et al.  Evaluation of CO2 free electricity trading market in Japan by multi-agent simulations , 2010 .

[14]  Peter Holmes Kobos,et al.  Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy , 2004 .

[15]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[16]  Won Sang Lee.  Observation of Underwater Earthquakes by Using a Hydroacoustic Monitoring System , 2011 .

[17]  Stanton W. Hadley,et al.  Electricity sector analysis in the clean energy futures study , 2001 .

[18]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  The Analysis of Security Cost for Different Energy Sources , 2009 .

[19]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies , 2010 .

[20]  Sungyeol Choi,et al.  Fourteen lessons learned from the successful nuclear power program of the Republic of Korea , 2009 .

[21]  M. Lieberman.  The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy , 1987 .

[22]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments , 2008 .

[23]  Hyun-Joon Chang.  New horizons for Korean energy industry—shifting paradigms and challenges ahead , 2003 .

[24]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi.  Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey , 2008 .

[25]  Randall Spalding-Fecher,et al.  Electricity and externalities in South Africa , 2003 .

[26]  J. Kim Swales,et al.  The regional electricity generation mix in Scotland: A portfolio selection approach , 2010 .

[27]  R. Sparks,et al.  The experience curve, option value, and the energy paradox , 2009 .

[28]  W.G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  Introducing errors in progress ratios determined from experience curves , 2008 .

[29]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[30]  Stephan Alberth,et al.  Forecasting technology costs via the experience curve — Myth or magic? , 2008 .

[31]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  Competitive Cost Dynamics: The Experience Curve , 1982 .