User-centered semantic harmonization: A case study

Semantic interoperability is one of the great challenges in biomedical informatics. Methods such as ontology alignment or use of metadata neither scale nor fundamentally alleviate semantic heterogeneity among information sources. In the context of the Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid program, the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) has been making an ambitious effort to harmonize existing information models for clinical research from a variety of sources and modeling agreed-upon semantics shared by the technical harmonization committee and the developers of these models. This paper provides some observations on this user-centered semantic harmonization effort and its inherent technical and social challenges. The authors also compare BRIDG with related efforts to achieve semantic interoperability in healthcare, including UMLS, InterMed, the Semantic Web, and the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations initiative. The BRIDG project demonstrates the feasibility of user-centered collaborative domain modeling as an approach to semantic harmonization, but also highlights a number of technology gaps in support of collaborative semantic harmonization that remain to be filled.

[1]  Marc Berg,et al.  The contextual nature of medical information , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Arnon Rosenthal,et al.  Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems , 1994, TODS.

[3]  John H. Gennari,et al.  Integrating Genomic Knowledge Sources Through an Anatomy Ontology , 2005, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[4]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure , 1995, CACM.

[5]  Michel Klein,et al.  Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[6]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  Review Paper: The InterMed Approach to Sharable Computer-interpretable Guidelines: A Review , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  A Rossi Mori,et al.  Exploiting the terminological approach from CEN/TC251 and GALEN to support semantic interoperability of healthcare record systems. , 1998, International journal of medical informatics.

[8]  Peter Denno,et al.  An analysis and approach to using existing ontological systems for applications in manufacturing , 2000, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Dan Suciu,et al.  A framework for using reference ontologies as a foundation for the semantic web , 2006, AMIA.

[10]  Wendy Hall,et al.  The Semantic Web Revisited , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Paliath Narendran,et al.  Matching, unification and complexity , 1987, SIGS.

[12]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for ontology merging and alignment , 2000, AAAI 2000.

[13]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Knowledge Provenance Infrastructure , 2003, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[14]  Sebastián Uchitel,et al.  System architecture: the context for scenario-based model synthesis , 2004, SIGSOFT '04/FSE-12.

[15]  Wendy London,et al.  Harmonization of IT laws , 1994, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[16]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Asynchronous collaborative writing through annotations , 2004, CSCW.

[17]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Some Issues on Ontology Integration , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[18]  I. Sim,et al.  Beyond Trial Registration: A Global Trial Bank for Clinical Trial Reporting , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[19]  Shiva Nejati,et al.  Formal support for merging and negotiation , 2005, ASE.

[20]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  An Analysis of Ontology Mismatches; Heterogeneity versus Interoperability , 2007 .

[21]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration , 2003, J. Digit. Inf..

[22]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Josef Ingenerf,et al.  Standardized terminological services enabling semantic interoperability between distributed and heterogeneous systems , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  Janet Cugini,et al.  The common criteria: on the road to international harmonization , 1995 .

[25]  David W. McDonald,et al.  A Collaborative Clinical Trial Protocol Writing System , 2004, MedInfo.

[26]  Cornelius Rosse,et al.  A Reference Ontology for Bioinformatics: The Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003 .

[27]  Martin Doerr,et al.  The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata , 2003, AI Mag..

[28]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[29]  Michael G. Kahn,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Improving Protocol Quality , 2002 .

[30]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Viewpoint: The Unified Medical Language System: Toward a Collaborative Approach for Solving Terminologic Problems , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  J. M. Daly,et al.  Electrotechnical standardization harmonization in North America , 1996, IAS '96. Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting.

[32]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation , 2003, ICAIL.