The Triple Helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new forms of capital

Triple Helix paradigm - a construct addressing the research-based links between government, universities, and firms - is lacking in formal tests. This study attempts to alleviate this deficiency by conducting an empirical analysis of the effects of relationship-based forms of capital, which has been identified by theorists as an attribute of Triple Helix-based R&D. OLS results utilising a unique dataset (KORTAI R&D) comprised of 108 questionnaire responses of Korean directors and project leaders reveal that new forms of capital are especially significant for firms and universities while less so for government research institutes (GRIs). The effects for universities, however, are delayed and indicate a spillover effect.

[1]  Young-jin Choi,et al.  Success Factors for Transferring Technology to Spin-off Applications: the Case of The Technology Property Rights Concession Program in Korea , 2000 .

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[3]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[4]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[5]  Linsu Kim,et al.  National system of industrial innovation : dynamics of capability building in Korea , 1991 .

[6]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, learning, and innovation : experiences of newly industrializing economies , 2000 .

[7]  H. Diz,et al.  How Can University-Industry-Government Interactions Change the Innovation Scenario in Portugal? - the Case of the University of Coimbra , 2006 .

[8]  A. Bernasconi,et al.  University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000 , 2005 .

[9]  R. Maxfield,et al.  Suggested Citation , 1999 .

[10]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[11]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[12]  Rosalba Casas,et al.  The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico: a regional approach to networking , 2000 .

[13]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains , 2006, Scientometrics.

[14]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[15]  L. Westphal,et al.  Industrial Policy in an Export-Propelled Economy: Lessons from South Korea's Experience , 1990 .

[16]  Girma Zawdie,et al.  From technology transfer to the emergence of a triple helix culture: the experience of Algeria in innovation and technological capability development , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[18]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Enterprise-University Co-operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy , 2002 .

[20]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Handbook of Industrial Organization , 1989 .

[21]  Georg Krücken.  Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the "third academic mission" at German universities , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Rosalie Ruegg,et al.  A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade , 2003 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[24]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Dieter Ernst.  Catching-Up and Post-Crisis Industrial Upgrading: Searching for New Sources of Growth in Korea's Electronics Industry , 2000 .

[26]  A Sapienza,et al.  Knowledge Frontiers: Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics, and Parallel Computing , 1996 .

[27]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[28]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[29]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it?☆ , 1990 .

[30]  Léa Velho,et al.  Knowledge Frontiers: Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics, and Parallel Computing , 1995 .

[31]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  FAILURE AND SUCCESS : THE FATE OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY IN LATIN AMERICA AND SOUTH EAST ASIA , 1999 .

[32]  Linsu Kim,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Learning in Industrialisation , 2001 .

[33]  Thomas Andersson,et al.  Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy: Making the Transition , 2001 .

[34]  Howard Pack,et al.  Innovative East Asia: The Future of Growth , 2006 .