Characterizing a noninsertable directional device using the NIST uncertainty framework

We characterize and provide uncertainties for a noninsertable, directional device over a frequency range of 90 to 100 GHz using the NIST Microwave Uncertainty Framework in conjunction with a commercial vector network analyzer. Our device consists of a chain of components, including a coaxial-to-waveguide adapter, a waveguide band-pass filter, a waveguide low-noise amplifier, a waveguide isolator, and a waveguide taper. With the aforementioned directional components, the well-known adapter removal technique is not adequate on its own for characterizing our device. In this paper, we describe and implement our method, and propagate the uncertainties from the two required calibrations to the characterized device.

[1]  Paul Penfield,et al.  De-Embedding and Unterminating , 1974 .

[2]  A. Dienstfrey,et al.  Calibration of sampling oscilloscopes with high-speed photodiodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[3]  Jack C. M. Wang,et al.  An optimal vector-network-analyzer calibration algorithm , 2003 .

[4]  J. Randa,et al.  Comparison of adapter characterization methods , 1999 .

[5]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[6]  Howard C. Reader,et al.  Wideband Frequency-Domain Characterization of High-Impedance Probes , 2001, 58th ARFTG Conference Digest.

[7]  Arkadiusz Lewandowski,et al.  Multi-frequency approach to vector-network-analyzer scattering-parameter measurements , 2010, The 40th European Microwave Conference.

[8]  P. D. Hale,et al.  Establishing traceability of an electronic calibration unit using the NIST Microwave Uncertainty Framework , 2012, 79th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference.

[9]  U. Arz,et al.  Characterizing WR-8 waveguide-to-CPW probes using two methods implemented within the NIST Uncertainty Framework , 2012, 80th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference.

[10]  J. Martens Common adapter/fixture extraction techniques: sensitivities to calibration anomalies , 2009, 2009 74th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference.

[11]  U. Arz,et al.  Coplanar microwave probe characterization: Caveats and pitfalls , 2006, 2006 67th ARFTG Conference.

[12]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  Covariance-Based Vector-Network-Analyzer Uncertainty Analysis for Time- and Frequency-Domain Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.