Improving Writing Opportunities in Elementary Classrooms

Although the benefits of using writing to help students reformulate and extend knowledge of a topic are often claimed, examination of writing practices in schools shows that teachers infrequently and unproductively use writing to promote knowledge development. This article describes features of writing assignments that provide knowledge development opportunities: higher-level thought processes are identified and used; text development is a tool for knowledge development; the written form facilitates knowledge development; students are encouraged to use control strategies; the design is appropriate to students' learning needs; and writing relates to other classroom activities designed to promote knowledge development. The instructional support required throughout the writing process is also described: teacher guidance and assistance for idea and text production are provided; the support is related to current learning needs; knowledge development is encouraged and rewarded; students are supported in making authorship decisions; and writing takes place within a learning environment that promotes subject matter understanding. Research in an elementary classroom (grades 1-3) is used to illustrate ways in which features of and instructional support for 2 writing assignments led to different opportunities for students to understand American history.

[1]  Arthur N. Applebee The Writing Report Card: Writing Achievement in American Schools. , 1986 .

[2]  C. Evans Writing to Learn in Math. , 1984 .

[3]  R. Perrin Writing in the Elementary Classroom. , 1984 .

[4]  V. Rockcastle Nothing Succeeds Like Succession. , 1986 .

[5]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  Instructional Scaffolding: Reading and Writing as Natural Language Activities , 1983, Language Arts.

[6]  Writing as a Way of Knowing in a Mathematics Education Class. , 1985 .

[7]  J. Emig Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[8]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[9]  James Moffett,et al.  Integrity in the Teaching of Writing. , 1979 .

[10]  J. Hayes,et al.  The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. , 1980 .

[11]  J. Bruner The ontogenesis of speech acts , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  What writers know : the language, process, and structure of written discourse , 1982 .

[13]  D. Laplane Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[14]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[15]  D. Gentner,et al.  A framework for a cognitive theory of writing , 1980 .

[16]  Judith A. Langer The Effects of Available Information on Responses to School Writing Tasks. , 1984 .

[17]  Patricia M. Cunningham,et al.  Content Area Reading-Writing Lessons. , 1987 .

[18]  Christopher M. Clark,et al.  What Is Writing For?: Writing in the First Weeks of School in a Second/Third Grade Classroom. , 1980 .

[19]  G. Hillocks,et al.  Research on written composition , 1986 .