The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato

[1]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  The genetics of inbreeding depression , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  Nathan M. Springer,et al.  Heterosis Is Prevalent for Multiple Traits in Diverse Maize Germplasm , 2009, PloS one.

[3]  E. Bayer,et al.  Auxin patterns Solanum lycopersicum leaf morphogenesis , 2009, Development.

[4]  M. McMullen,et al.  Genetic Properties of the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population , 2009, Science.

[5]  J. Bowman,et al.  The flowering hormone florigen functions as a general systemic regulator of growth and termination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  André Beló,et al.  Allelic genome structural variations in maize detected by array comparative genome hybridization , 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[7]  A. A. Borges,et al.  Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process , 2008, BMC Plant Biology.

[8]  J. Crow.  Mid-century controversies in population genetics. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[9]  W. Sullivan,et al.  The genetics and cell biology of Wolbachia-host interactions. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[10]  Oded Cohen,et al.  The Making of a Compound Inflorescence in Tomato and Related Nightshades , 2008, PLoS biology.

[11]  S. Bottani,et al.  Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  D. Hoyle,et al.  Identification and characterization of high-flux-control genes of yeast through competition analyses in continuous cultures , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[13]  D. Weigel,et al.  Move on up, it's time for change--mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. , 2007, Genes & development.

[14]  J. Birchler,et al.  Biological consequences of dosage dependent gene regulatory systems. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  Z. Lippman,et al.  Heterosis: revisiting the magic. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  Bruce D. Smith,et al.  The Molecular Genetics of Crop Domestication , 2006, Cell.

[17]  J. Slate,et al.  Heterozygote Advantage for Fecundity , 2006, PloS one.

[18]  Naama Menda,et al.  Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Y. Eshed,et al.  The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  U. Roessner,et al.  Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  D. Zamir,et al.  Unused Natural Variation Can Lift Yield Barriers in Plant Breeding , 2004, PLoS biology.

[22]  Naama Menda,et al.  In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[23]  G. Rédei.  Single locus heterosis , 1962, Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre.

[24]  D. Schwartz.  Single gene heterosis for alcohol dehydrogenase in maize: the nature of the subunit interaction , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[25]  James A. Birchler,et al.  In Search of the Molecular Basis of Heterosis , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[26]  ARE INDUCED MUTATIONS IN DROSOPHILA OVERDOMINANT? , 2003 .

[27]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). , 2002, Genome.

[28]  F. Cellini,et al.  The tomato Blind gene encodes a MYB transcription factor that controls the formation of lateral meristems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Crow.  Dominance and overdominance , 1999 .

[30]  K. Theres,et al.  The Lateral suppressor (Ls) gene of tomato encodes a new member of the VHIID protein family. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Ganal,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. , 1998, Development.

[32]  Byung Han Choi,et al.  The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops , 1997 .

[33]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Nature Genetics , 1991, Nature.

[35]  R. Falk.  Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? II. Experimental results. , 1961, Genetics.

[36]  H. Muller,et al.  Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design. , 1961, Genetics.

[37]  W. Williams.  Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters , 1960, Heredity.

[38]  B. Wallace.  THE EFFECT OF HETEROZYGOSITY FOR NEW MUTATIONS ON VIABILITY IN Drosophila: A PRELIMINARY REPORT. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Sherman,et al.  A Preliminary Report , 1953 .

[40]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[41]  W. Whaley.  A DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS OF HETEROSIS IN LYCOPERSICON I. THE RELATION OF GROWTH RATE TO HETEROSIS , 1939 .

[42]  G. Shull.  The composition of a field of maize , 1908 .

[43]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1972 .