Privacy Management in Social Internet of Vehicles: Review, Challenges and Blockchain Based Solutions

The Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm has integrated the sensor network silos to the Internet and enabled the provision of value-added services across these networks. These smart devices are now becoming socially conscious by following the social Internet of Things (SIoT) model that empowers them to create and maintain social relationships among them. The Social Internet of Vehicle (SIoV) is one application of SIoT in the vehicular domain that has evolved the existing intelligent transport system (ITS) and vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) to the next phase of Intelligent by adding socializing aspect and constant connectivity. SIoV generates a massive amount of real-time data enriched with context and social relationship information about vehicles, drivers, passengers, and the surrounding environment. Therefore, the role of privacy management becomes essential in SIoV, as data is collected and stored at different layers of its architecture. The challenge of privacy is aggravated because the dynamic nature of SIoV poses a major threat in its adoption. Motivated by the need to address these aspects, this paper identifies the challenges involved in managing privacy in SIoV. Furthermore, the paper analyzes the privacy issues and factors that are essential to be considered for preserving privacy in SIoV environments from different perspectives including the privacy of a person, behavior and action, communication, data and image, thoughts and feelings, location and space, and association. In addition, the paper discusses the blockchain-based solutions to preserve privacy for SIoV.

[1]  Min Chen,et al.  Cognitive Internet of Vehicles , 2018, Comput. Commun..

[2]  Oscar Garcia Morchon,et al.  Efficient distributed security for wireless medical sensor networks , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.

[3]  Khaled Salah,et al.  IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[4]  Rajen Akalu Privacy, consent and vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) , 2018, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[5]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  I Have a DREAM! (DiffeRentially privatE smArt Metering) , 2011, Information Hiding.

[6]  Huirong Fu,et al.  Privacy Issues of Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks , 2010 .

[7]  Ahmed Ahmim,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Schemes for Ad Hoc Social Networks: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Bin Hu,et al.  A City-Wide Real-Time Traffic Management System: Enabling Crowdsensing in Social Internet of Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Yaser Jararweh,et al.  An intrusion detection system for connected vehicles in smart cities , 2019, Ad Hoc Networks.

[10]  Burak Kantarci,et al.  On the Feasibility of Deep Learning in Sensor Network Intrusion Detection , 2019, IEEE Networking Letters.

[11]  Wenjing Lou,et al.  Dependable and Secure Sensor Data Storage with Dynamic Integrity Assurance , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[12]  Andreas Unterweger,et al.  Privacy-preserving blockchain-based electric vehicle charging with dynamic tariff decisions , 2018, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[13]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems , 2012, CCS.

[14]  Carmela Troncoso,et al.  PrETP: Privacy-Preserving Electronic Toll Pricing , 2010, USENIX Security Symposium.

[15]  Aaron Roth,et al.  The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy , 2014, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  BlockChain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Vehicle as a resource for continuous service availability in smart cities , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[18]  Frank Piessens,et al.  Key Reinstallation Attacks: Forcing Nonce Reuse in WPA2 , 2017, CCS.

[19]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Integration challenges of intelligent transportation systems with connected vehicle, cloud computing, and internet of things technologies , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[20]  Gang Qu,et al.  A Survey on Recent Advances in Vehicular Network Security, Trust, and Privacy , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  Block-VN: A Distributed Blockchain Based Vehicular Network Architecture in Smart City , 2017, J. Inf. Process. Syst..

[22]  Ming Li,et al.  Data security and privacy in wireless body area networks , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[23]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Social Internet of Things (SIoT) - When social networks meet the Internet of Things: Concept, architecture and network characterization , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[24]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Securing Vehicle to Vehicle Communications using Blockchain through Visible Light and Acoustic Side-Channels , 2017, ArXiv.

[25]  Burak Kantarci,et al.  Detection of Known and Unknown Intrusive Sensor Behavior in Critical Applications , 2017, IEEE Sensors Letters.

[26]  G. Aceto The social internet of things (SIoT)-When social networks meet the internet of things: Concept, architecture and network characterization , 2017 .

[27]  Ian Goldberg,et al.  Optimally Robust Private Information Retrieval , 2012, USENIX Security Symposium.

[28]  Michael Weber,et al.  V-Tokens for Conditional Pseudonymity in VANETs , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[29]  Ankur Taly,et al.  Privacy, Discovery, and Authentication for the Internet of Things , 2016, ESORICS.

[30]  Wei Cheng,et al.  Characterizing privacy leakage of public WiFi networks for users on travel , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[31]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Fairness-Aware Game Theoretic Approach for Service Management in Vehicular Clouds , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[32]  Yaser Jararweh,et al.  Data and Service Management in Densely Crowded Environments: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recent Developments , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein,et al.  Privacy Assessment of De-identified Opal Data: A report for Transport for NSW , 2017, ArXiv.

[34]  Michael Friedewald,et al.  Seven Types of Privacy , 2013, European Data Protection.

[35]  Robert K. Cunningham,et al.  SoK: Privacy on Mobile Devices – It’s Complicated , 2016, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[36]  Mauro Conti,et al.  A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[37]  Panos Kalnis,et al.  Private queries in location based services: anonymizers are not necessary , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[38]  Kai Zhao,et al.  Beyond K-Anonymity: Protect Your Trajectory from Semantic Attack , 2017, 2017 14th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON).

[39]  Vinod Vaikuntanathan,et al.  Efficient Fully Homomorphic Encryption from (Standard) LWE , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[40]  Serge Gutwirth,et al.  European Data Protection: Coming of Age , 2013, European Data Protection.

[41]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: Architecture, Protocols, and Security , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[42]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications , 2011, J. Syst. Softw..

[43]  Kejie Lu,et al.  Cloud-Assisted Safety Message Dissemination in VANET–Cellular Heterogeneous Wireless Network , 2017, IEEE Systems Journal.

[44]  Yih-Chun Hu,et al.  Efficient Certificate Revocation List Organization and Distribution , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[45]  N. Truong,et al.  A Reputation and Knowledge Based Trust Service Platform for Trustworthy Social Internet of Things , 2016 .

[46]  Reinhard German,et al.  SlotSwap: strong and affordable location privacy in intelligent transportation systems , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[47]  Lei Wang,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Content Dissemination for Vehicular Social Networks: Challenges and Solutions , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[48]  Yiqing Zhou,et al.  Heterogeneous Vehicular Networking: A Survey on Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[49]  Wathiq Mansoor,et al.  A survey on context-aware vehicular network applications , 2016, Veh. Commun..

[50]  Yaser Jararweh,et al.  Congestion Mitigation in Densely Crowded Environments for Augmenting QoS in Vehicular Clouds , 2018, DIVANet'18.

[51]  Arushi Arora,et al.  Block Chain Based Security Mechanism for Internet of Vehicles (IoV) , 2018 .

[52]  Frank Kargl,et al.  Pseudonym Schemes in Vehicular Networks: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[53]  Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik,et al.  Toward Social Internet of Vehicles: Concept, Architecture, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Access.

[54]  Klaus Wehrle,et al.  Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges , 2014, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[55]  Jianhua Li,et al.  A Secure Mechanism for Big Data Collection in Large Scale Internet of Vehicle , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[56]  Razi Iqbal,et al.  Social Internet of Vehicles: Architecture and enabling technologies , 2018, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[57]  Hussein T. Mouftah,et al.  Connected and Autonomous Electric Vehicles (CAEVs) , 2018, IT Professional.