Looking at the label and beyond: the effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants

BackgroundRecent legislation has required calorie labels on restaurant menus as a means of improving Americans’ health. Despite the growing research in this area, no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of menu labels. This suggests the possibility of heterogeneity in responses to caloric labels across people with different attitudes and demographics. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential relationships between caloric intake and diners’ socio-economic characteristics and attitudes in a restaurant field experiment that systematically varied the caloric information printed on the menus.MethodsWe conducted a field experiment in a full service restaurant where patrons were randomly assigned to one of three menu treatments which varied the amount of caloric information printed on the menus (none, numeric, or symbolic calorie label). At the conclusion of their meals, diners were asked to complete a brief survey regarding their socio-economic characteristics, attitudes, and meal selections. Using regression analysis, we estimated the number of entrée and extra calories ordered by diners as a function of demographic and attitudinal variables. Additionally, irrespective of the menu treatment to which a subject was assigned, our study identified which types of people are likely to be low-, medium-, and high-calorie diners.ResultsResults showed that calorie labels have the greatest impact on those who are least health conscious. Additionally, using a symbolic calorie label can further reduce the caloric intake of even the most health conscious patrons. Finally, calorie labels were more likely to influence the selection of the main entrée as opposed to supplemental items such as drinks and desserts.ConclusionsIf numeric calorie labels are implemented (as currently proposed), they are most likely to influence consumers who are less health conscious – probably one of the key targets of this legislation. Unfortunately, numeric labels did little for those consumers who were already more knowledgeable about health and nutrition. To reach a broader group of diners, a symbolic calorie label may be preferred as it reduced caloric intake across all levels of health consciousness.

[1]  Scot Burton,et al.  What Consumers Don't Know Can Hurt Them: Consumer Evaluations and Disease Risk Perceptions of Restaurant Menu Items , 2004 .

[2]  Scot Burton,et al.  Attacking the obesity epidemic: the potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[3]  Jill J. McCluskey,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Detailed versus Summary Formats of Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels , 2008 .

[4]  D. O'Gorman,et al.  Active commuting to school: How far is too far? , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  S. French,et al.  Effect of point-of-purchase calorie labeling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: A review of the literature , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[6]  P W Goodell,et al.  Identifying the health conscious consumer. , 1993, Journal of health care marketing.

[7]  R. Jeffery,et al.  Why eat at fast-food restaurants: reported reasons among frequent consumers. , 2008, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[8]  M. Heymans,et al.  Small portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: do they help consumers to reduce their food intake? , 2011, International Journal of Obesity.

[9]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  The Biasing Health Halos of Fast Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions , 2007 .

[10]  Gavan J. Fitzsimons,et al.  Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision , 2009 .

[11]  Anthony J Viera,et al.  Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  K. Glanz,et al.  Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. , 1998, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[13]  Douglas E Levy,et al.  A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. , 2012, American journal of public health.