Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5‐C6 segment

A fully three‐dimensional finite element model of a C5‐C6 motion segment of the human spine was developed and validated for the purpose of investigating the biomechanical significance of uncinate processes and Luschka joints. The original intact cervical model was modified to create two additional models. The first simulated the absence of Luschka joints by replacing the fissures with continuous annulus fibrosus and leaving the uncinate processes intact. The second model simulated a surgical resection of the uncinate processes, while leaving the Luschka joints intact. The results of these two models were compared with the intact model, which served as a baseline; thus, the relative contributions of these two structures to cervical motion were established With use of our model, it was possible for the first time, to provide quantitative data concerning the source of coupled motions in the lower cervical spine. In principle, the results from this model support the hypothesis of Penning and Wilmink. Our resultsindicate that the facet joints and Luschka joints are the major contributors to coupled motion in the lower cervical spine and that the uncinate processes effectively reduce motion coupling and primary cervical motion (motion in the same direction as load application), especially in response to axial rotation and lateral bending loads. Luschka joints appear to increase primary cervical motion, showing an effect on cervical motion opposite to that of the uncinate processes. Surgeons should be aware of the increase in motion accompanied by resection of the uncinate processes.

[1]  L Penning,et al.  Rotation of the Cervical Spine: A CT Study in Normal Subjects , 1987, Spine.

[2]  F. G. Evans,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone. , 1969, Artificial limbs.

[3]  V K Goel,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior Caspar plate and three-level posterior fixation techniques in a human cadaveric model. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  Application of Finite Element Techniques to the Study of Cervical Spine Mechanics , 1993 .

[5]  W Goldsmith,et al.  Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  A. Schultz,et al.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  N. Milne,et al.  Composite motion in cervical disc segments. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  V K Goel,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of Caspar and Cervical Spine Locking Plate systems in a cadaveric model. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  L. Penning Normal movements of the cervical spine. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  L Penning,et al.  Differences in anatomy, motion, development and aging of the upper and lower cervical disk segments. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  J D Clausen,et al.  Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[12]  T Belytschko,et al.  Theory and application of a three-dimensional model of the human spine. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  T Merrill,et al.  Three-dimensional response of a lumped parameter head-neck model due to impact and impulsive loading. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  K Kedzior,et al.  A Biomechanical Model of the Human Spinal System , 1991, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  T Yamamuro,et al.  Analysis and Prevention of Spinal Column Deformity Following Cervical Laminectomy I: Pathogenetic Analysis of Postlaminectomy Deformities , 1991, Spine.

[16]  Broberg Kb,et al.  On the Mechanical Behaviour of Intervertebral Discs , 1983 .