A de novo designed protein–protein interface

As an approach to both explore the physical/chemical parameters that drive molecular self‐assembly and to generate novel protein oligomers, we have developed a procedure to generate protein dimers from monomeric proteins using computational protein docking and amino acid sequence design. A fast Fourier transform‐based docking algorithm was used to generate a model for a dimeric version of the 56‐amino‐acid β1 domain of streptococcal protein G. Computational amino acid sequence design of 24 residues at the dimer interface resulted in a heterodimer comprised of 12‐fold and eightfold variants of the wild‐type protein. The designed proteins were expressed, purified, and characterized using analytical ultracentrifugation and heteronuclear NMR techniques. Although the measured dissociation constant was modest (∼300 μM), 2D‐[1H,15N]‐HSQC NMR spectra of one of the designed proteins in the absence and presence of its binding partner showed clear evidence of specific dimer formation.

[1]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computational design of protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[2]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Joël Janin,et al.  Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[4]  T. Baker,et al.  Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Protein design automation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[9]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Thornton,et al.  Diversity of protein–protein interactions , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[11]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[12]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1993, Science.

[13]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[14]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  Po-Ssu Huang,et al.  Adaptation of a fast Fourier transform‐based docking algorithm for protein design , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[19]  A designed protein interface that blocks fibril formation. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  S. Honda,et al.  Role of side-chains in the cooperative beta-hairpin folding of the short C-terminal fragment derived from streptococcal protein G. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[21]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[23]  M. Hecht,et al.  Recombinant Proteins Can Be Isolated from E. coli Cells by Repeated Cycles of Freezing and Thawing , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[24]  Marc S. Lewis,et al.  Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: A tutorial review , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  S. A. Marshall,et al.  Energy functions for protein design. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  S. Honda,et al.  Thermodynamics of a beta-hairpin structure: evidence for cooperative formation of folding nucleus. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[29]  D. Benjamin Gordon,et al.  Exact rotamer optimization for protein design , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  Joël Janin,et al.  Protein modules and protein-protein interaction. Introduction. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[31]  Johan Desmet,et al.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning , 1992, Nature.

[32]  Nora H Barakat,et al.  Exploiting elements of transcriptional machinery to enhance protein stability. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.