Measurement of analytical knowledge-based corporate memory and its application

In the current knowledge-driven economy, businesses are increasingly required to function as knowledge-based organizations. In these organizations, knowledge usually serves as the means for attainment of competitive advantage. It is clear that organizational knowledge has to be carefully managed, and knowledge management measurement is important to businesses. In this paper, corporate memory (CM) is viewed as an organization memory for managing knowledge. Generically and concretely, CM is constructed using analytical knowledge (AK), which is defined as the knowledge formatted with 5W1H (who, when, where, what, why, and how). AK is extracted from data storage systems and domain experts by aggregating information, where data analysts, knowledge workers, and knowledge users are involved in a knowledge discovery process. The research objective of this study is to propose a measurement approach, which provides a generic and applicable methodology for measuring the performance and quality of CM. To represent the uncertainty and fuzzy terms in the evaluation environments, and to explicate the invisible impact induced by information technology (IT), the fuzzy set theory is applied. An effective procedure is also proposed to apply the measurement approach in practice. Highlights? A generic and applicable approach for measuring the performance and quality of CM ? The fuzzy set theory and the S-shaped logistic model are employed. ? A definite and effective procedure is able to support the measurement in practice. ? The method is able to manage knowledge and then develop strategies in businesses. ? The method facilitates the development of strategies for intellectual capital.

[1]  Yong Zhang,et al.  An incident information management framework based on data integration, data mining, and multi-criteria decision making , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  XML-based modeling of corporate memory , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[3]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[4]  Chun-Che Huang,et al.  The transformation and search of semi-structured knowledge in organizations , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Gertjan van Heijst,et al.  Corporate memories as a tool for knowledge management , 1997 .

[7]  Randall Davis,et al.  Use of meta level knowledge in the construction and maintenance of large knowledge bases , 1976 .

[8]  Frederick Hayes-Roth Towards Benchmarks for Knowledge Systems and Their Implications for Data Engineering , 1989, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[9]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[10]  I. Nonaka The knowledge creating company". Harvard Business Review : . , 1991 .

[11]  Richard H. Weston,et al.  The complementary use of IDEF and UML modelling approaches , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Jian Ma,et al.  Fuzzy group decision support system for project assessment , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[13]  G. Weinberg An Introduction to General Systems Thinking , 1975 .

[14]  Javier Andrade Garda,et al.  Formal conceptualisation as a basis for a more procedural knowledge management , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Giancarlo Mauri,et al.  Evaluating Performance and Quality of Knowledge-Based Systems: Foundation and Methodology , 1993, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[17]  D. Teece Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context , 2000 .

[18]  K. Peffers,et al.  Performance effects of innovative IT applications over time , 1996 .

[19]  Shan Feng,et al.  Decision support for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban development , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  G. Weinberg An introduction to general systems thinking (silver anniversary ed.) , 2001 .

[21]  Jian Ma,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student-centered learning , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[22]  Caroline C. Hayes,et al.  QUEM: An Achievement Test for Knowledge-Based Systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[23]  Xi Chen,et al.  A framework for context sensitive services: A knowledge discovery based approach , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Dawn G. Gregg,et al.  Dynamic interaction in knowledge based systems: An exploratory investigation and empirical evaluation , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[26]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[27]  Dario Maio,et al.  A modular user-oriented decision support for physical database design , 1987 .

[28]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach , 1999 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An investigation into knowledge acquisition using a group decision support system , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[30]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[31]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[32]  Otto Kühn,et al.  Conserving corporate knowledge for crankshaft design , 1994, IEA/AIE '94.

[33]  Eric W. Stein,et al.  Organization memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management , 1995 .