Multi-criteria analysis applied to multi-objective optimal pump scheduling in water systems

This work presents a multi-criteria-based approach to automatically select specific non-dominated solutions from a Pareto front previously obtained using multi-objective optimization to find optimal solutions for pump control in a water supply system. Optimal operation of pumps in these utilities is paramount to enable water companies to achieve energy efficiency in their systems. The Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) is used to rank the Pareto solutions found by the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) employed to solve the multi-objective problem. Various scenarios are evaluated under leakage uncertainty conditions, resulting in fuzzy solutions for the Pareto front. This paper shows the suitability of the approach for quasi real-world problems. In our case-study, the obtained solutions for scenarios including leakage represent the best trade-off among the optimal solutions, under some considered criteria, namely, operational cost, operational lack of service, pressure uniformity and network resilience. Potential future developments could include the use of clustering alternatives to evaluate the goodness of each solution under the considered evaluation criteria. doi: 10.2166/ws.2019.115 om https://iwaponline.com/ws/article-pdf/19/8/2338/662043/ws019082338.pdf 20 Silvia Carpitella (corresponding author) Antonella Certa Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Universitá degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo, 90128, Italy E-mail: silvia.carpitella@unipa.it Silvia Carpitella Joaquín Izquierdo FluIng, Universitat Politècnica de València, 5C Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain Bruno Brentan Laboratory of Computational Hydraulics, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Idel Montalvo IngeniousWare GmbH, Jollystrasse 11, Kahlsruhe, 76137, Germany

[1]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Chengchao Xu,et al.  Optimal Valve Control in Water‐Distribution Networks , 1990 .

[4]  Al-HaiqiAhmed,et al.  Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS , 2015 .

[5]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Real-time modelling of a major water supply system , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[7]  Sadeque Hamdan,et al.  Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Présentation et interprétation de la méthode ELECTRE TRI pour affecter des zones dans des catégories de risque , 2002 .

[9]  Paul Jowitt,et al.  Optimal Pump Scheduling in Water‐Supply Networks , 1992 .

[10]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach , 2000 .

[11]  Helena Mala-Jetmarova,et al.  Lost in optimisation of water distribution systems? A literature review of system operation , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Idel Montalvo,et al.  Water Distribution System Computer‐Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization , 2014, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[13]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Jacek Żak,et al.  Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV methods to multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of urban transportation projects , 2015 .

[15]  Joaquín Izquierdo,et al.  Joint Operation of Pressure-Reducing Valves and Pumps for Improving the Efficiency of Water Distribution Systems , 2018, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.

[16]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  The Battle of the Water Sensor Networks (BWSN): A Design Challenge for Engineers and Algorithms , 2008 .

[17]  Yuval Hadas,et al.  Urban bus network of priority lanes: A combined multi-objective, multi-criteria and group decision-making approach , 2016 .

[18]  Eduardo Fernández,et al.  Incorporation of implicit decision-maker preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimization using a multi-criteria classification method , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  Rita Gamberini,et al.  A multicriteria framework for inventory classification and control with application to intermittent demand , 2017 .

[20]  Christopher S. Stokes,et al.  Battle of the water networks ii: Combining engineering judgement with genetic algorithm optimisation , 2012 .

[21]  George Sebastian Naghiu,et al.  Choosing the Optimal Technology to Rehabilitate the Pipes in Water Distribution Systems Using the AHP Method , 2017 .

[22]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Real-Time Multiobjective Optimization of Operation of Water Supply Systems , 2015 .

[23]  B. B. Zaidan,et al.  Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  Antonella Certa,et al.  ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: An alternative to the risk priority number , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[26]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Battle of the Water Networks II , 2014 .

[27]  Silvia Carpitella,et al.  Multi-objective and multi-criteria analysis for optimal pump scheduling in water systems , 2018 .

[28]  Bruno Melo Brentan,et al.  Selection and location of Pumps as Turbines substituting pressure reducing valves , 2017 .

[29]  Mircea Ancău,et al.  The computation of Pareto-optimal set in multicriterial optimization of rapid prototyping processes , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..