Effects of visual feedback distortion for the elderly and the motor-impaired in a robotic rehabilitation environment

In order to design a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion, we investigated in this study the limits and effects of visual feedback distortion for the elderly and the motor-impaired. To determine the minimum imperceptible amount of visual distortion, we measured the Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs) for force and position for elderly, unimpaired subjects; values of 31.0% (0.619 N) and 16.1% (5.01 mm), respectively, were obtained. JNDs of 46.0% (0.920 N) and 45.0% (14.8 mm) were measured for a motor-impaired individual. These JNDs were larger than corresponding measurements previously taken with young subjects, showing a decrease in discrimination ability with age and impairment. Visual distortion based on these values caused elderly subjects and the motor-impaired individual to increase their force production levels by 72.5% and 97.7%, respectively. These results were similar to those obtained with young subjects, but differences were observed on interspersed trials with no visual feedback. Poor discrimination abilities in elderly and impaired subjects and visual dominance in our environment for this subject group support our hypothesis that visual distortion can be an effective tool for rehabilitation in a robotic environment.

[1]  M. S. Devanandan,et al.  Weight appreciation in the hand in normal subjects and in patients with leprous neuropathy. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  C M Wells,et al.  The self-efficacy-performance link in maximum strength performance. , 1993, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Feedback Distortion to Increase Strength and Mobility , 2003 .

[5]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Feedback distortion to overcome learned nonuse: a system overview , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[6]  N. Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W P Morgan,et al.  The 1980 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture. Psychophysiology of self-awareness during vigorous physical activity. , 1981, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  M. A. Srinivassan.  The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments , 1996 .

[10]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Measuring just noticeable differences for haptic force feedback: implications for rehabilitation , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[11]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: III. Differential sensitivity to changes in stimulus intensity. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[13]  N I Durlach,et al.  Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. , 1998 .

[15]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Robert W. Patton,et al.  The effect of beliefs on maximum weight-lifting performance , 1979, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[17]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  K Shinomori,et al.  Age-related changes in wavelength discrimination. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  N. Durlach,et al.  Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  H. Ross,et al.  Sensorimotor mechanisms in weight discrimination , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  J. R. Thomas,et al.  Does self-efficacy predict performance in experienced weightlifters? , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.