Más Tecnologia, Más Cambio?: Investigating an Educational Technology Project in Rural Peru

Providing access to and training in ICTs is seen as key to bridging the digital divide between technology-rich communities and those with poor IT infrastructures. Several projects have focused on providing ICTs for education in developing countries, of which the best known is One Laptop Per Child (OLPC). Although, there has been significant criticism of some of these projects, in particular OLPC, due to its use of a top-down implementation strategy and the limited evidence for its educational benefits, there has been comparatively little analysis of what underlies successful approaches. We aimed to address this deficit by conducting an ethnographic study of community-based projects organised by Blue Sparrow, a small charity that donates refurbished desktop computers to schools in rural Peru, as this organisation has experienced both successes and failures when implementing its educational technology projects. The relative success of Blue Sparrow highlights the benefits of: understanding local contexts; using a bottom up approach; involving stakeholders in setting programme objectives; and empowering communities. We argue that the educational impact of such projects can be improved by: providing teacher training; integrating computers into the wider curriculum; and providing teaching materials and clear objectives for volunteers.

[1]  Yong Zhao,et al.  One-to-One Computing: What Does it Bring to Schools? , 2008 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  One Laptop per Child: Vision vs. Reality , 2022 .

[3]  Theodore R. Alter,et al.  Bringing the Community Along: A Case Study of a School District's Information Technology Rural Development Initiative. , 2006 .

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Understanding sustained community engagement: a case study in heritage preservation in rural argentina , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Banque Interaméricaine de Développement,et al.  Experimental Assessment of The Program "One Laptop Per Child" in Peru , 2010 .

[6]  David R. Millen,et al.  Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research , 2000, DIS '00.

[7]  Sugata Mitra,et al.  Self organising systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the ‘hole in the wall’ experiments , 2005 .

[8]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Making the link - providing mobile media for novice communities in the developing world , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[10]  Nicholas Vonortas,et al.  A Report Card for One Laptop Per Child Closing the Digital Divide via ICTs and Education: Successes and Failures , 2007 .

[11]  Simon Bell,et al.  Information systems and developing countries , 1992 .

[12]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Early olpc experiences in a rural uruguayan school , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Noel,et al.  One Laptop Per Child , 2005 .

[14]  Richard Heeks Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development , 2010 .

[15]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Field testing mobile digital storytelling software in rural Kenya , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[16]  Morgan G. Ames,et al.  One laptop per child Birmingham: case study of a radical experiment , 2011 .

[17]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[18]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Usage models of classroom computing in developing regions , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[19]  Paula Kotzé,et al.  Indra's Net: HCI in the developing world , 2003, INTR.

[20]  Ritu Dangwal,et al.  Children's Learning Processes Using Unsupervised "Hole in the Wall" Computers in Shared Public Spaces. , 2008 .

[21]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[22]  Ana Santiago,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGRAM "ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD" , 2010 .

[23]  Sue Heath,et al.  Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions , 2007 .

[24]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers , 2013, CHI.

[25]  Ritu Dangwal,et al.  Limits to self-organising systems of learning - the Kalikuppam experiment , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Dissecting the "Digital Divide": A Case Study in Egypt , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[27]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools , 2011, CHI.

[28]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Can a Process Approach Improve ICT4D Project Success , 2011 .

[29]  Sakauti,et al.  Effects of remoteness on the quality of education : A case study from North Indian schools , 2008 .

[30]  Ana Santiago,et al.  Technology and Child Development: Evidence from the One Laptop Per Child Program , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  A. Battro One Laptop Per Child , 2013 .

[32]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[33]  M. Ames Can One Laptop per Child Save the World's Poor? , 2011 .