Lumbar spinal loads vary with body height and weight.

Knowledge about spinal loading is required for designing and preclinical testing of spinal implants. It is assumed that loading of the spine depends upon body weight and height, as well as on the spine level, but a direct measurement of the loading conditions throughout the spine is not yet possible. Here, computer models can allow an estimation of the forces and moments acting in the spine. The objective of the present study was to calculate spinal loads for different postures and activities at several levels of the thoracolumbar spine for various combinations of body height and weight. A validated musculoskeletal model, together with commercially available software (AnyBody Technology), were used to calculate the segmental loads acting on the centre of the upper endplate of the vertebrae T12 to L5. The body height was varied between 150 and 200 cm and the weight between 50 and 120 kg. The loads were determined for five standard static postures and three lifting tasks. The resultant forces and moments increased approximately linearly with increasing body weight. The body height had a nearly linear effect on the spinal loads, but in almost all loading cases, the effect on spinal loads was stronger for variation of body weight than of body height. Spinal loads generally increased from cranial to caudal. The presented data now allow the estimation of the spinal load during activities of daily living on a subject specific basis, if body height and weight are known.

[1]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Total Disc Replacement Positioning Affects Facet Contact Forces and Vertebral Body Strains , 2008, Spine.

[2]  L. Claes,et al.  The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.

[4]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. , 2003, Bone.

[5]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  An enhanced and validated generic thoraco-lumbar spine model for prediction of muscle forces. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Isao Ohnishi,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Vertebral Strength in Elderly Women Using Computed Tomography-Based Nonlinear Finite Element Model , 2008, Spine.

[7]  Michael Damsgaard,et al.  A General Method for Scaling Musculo-Skeletal Models , 2005 .

[8]  Bernhard Weisse,et al.  A multibody modelling approach to determine load sharing between passive elements of the lumbar spine , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[9]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Loads on a telemeterized vertebral body replacement measured in three patients within the first postoperative month. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads—application of kinematics-based algorithm , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[12]  R W Norman,et al.  Effects of an anatomically detailed erector spinae model on L4/L5 disc compression and shear. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M. Rowland,et al.  Self-reported weight and height. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[14]  L. Claes,et al.  Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data--a data set for the validation of models. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  A musculoskeletal foot model for clinical gait analysis. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Loads on a Telemeterized Vertebral Body Replacement Measured in Two Patients , 2008, Spine.

[17]  P. Zysset,et al.  Damage accumulation in vertebral trabecular bone depends on loading mode and direction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site , 2006, Spine.

[19]  I A Stokes,et al.  Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .

[22]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[23]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system? , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  John Rasmussen,et al.  A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  I. Lieberman,et al.  An In Vivo Comparison of the Potential for Extravertebral Cement Leak After Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty , 2002, Spine.

[26]  R. Norman,et al.  Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.