Transnational cocaine and heroin flow networks in western Europe: A comparison.

BACKGROUND A comparison of the properties of drug flow networks for cocaine and heroin in a group of 17 western European countries is provided with the aim of understanding the implications of their similarities and differences for drug policy. METHODS Drug flow data for the cocaine and heroin networks were analyzed using the UCINET software package. Country-level characteristics including hub and authority scores, core and periphery membership, and centrality, and network-level characteristics including network density, the results of a triad census, and the final fitness of the core-periphery structure of the network, were computed and compared between the two networks. RESULTS The cocaine network contains fewer path redundancies and a smaller, more tightly knit core than the heroin network. Authorities, hubs and countries central to the cocaine network tend to have higher hub, authority, and centrality scores than those in the heroin network. The core-periphery and hub-authority structures of the cocaine and heroin networks reflect the west-to-east and east-to-west patterns of flow of cocaine and heroin respectively across Europe. The key nodes in the cocaine and heroin networks are generally distinct from one another. CONCLUSION The analysis of drug flow networks can reveal important structural features of trafficking networks that can be useful for the allocation of scarce drug control resources. The identification of authorities, hubs, network cores, and network-central nodes can suggest foci for the allocation of these resources. In the case of Europe, while some countries are important to both cocaine and heroin networks, different sets of countries occupy positions of prominence in the two networks. The distinct nature of the cocaine and heroin networks also suggests that a one-size-fits-all supply- and interdiction-focused policy may not work as well as an approach that takes into account the particular characteristics of each network.

[1]  E. Kick,et al.  Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[3]  Marten Hanura,et al.  UPAYA UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME (UNODC) DALAM MENANGANI DRUG TRAFFICKING DI AFGHANISTAN PERIODE 2012-2013 , 2015 .

[4]  M. Kenney.  The Architecture of Drug Trafficking: Network Forms of Organisation in the Colombian Cocaine Trade , 2007 .

[5]  Siddharth Chandra,et al.  Inferring Cocaine Flows across Europe: Evidence from Price Data , 2011 .

[6]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Crime and Networks , 2013 .

[8]  M. Natarajan.  Understanding the Structure of a Large Heroin Distribution Network: A Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data , 2006 .

[9]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The centrality of groups and classes , 1999 .

[10]  David A. Smith,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980 , 1992 .

[11]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[12]  Simon Howell,et al.  West Africa and the transnational trade in illegal drugs: physical properties, policing, and power , 2015 .

[13]  G. Farrell,et al.  COCAINE AND HEROIN IN EUROPE 1983–93 A Cross-national Comparison of Trafficking and Prices , 1996 .

[14]  Paul De Grauwe,et al.  Globalization and the price decline of illicit drugs , 2009 .

[15]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1998, SODA '98.

[16]  J. Sands.  Organized Crime and Illicit Activities in Spain: Causes and Facilitating Factors , 2007 .

[17]  Peter Reuter,et al.  The World Heroin Market: Can Supply Be Cut? , 2009 .

[18]  R. Naylor,et al.  TOWARDS A GENERAL THEORY OF PROFIT-DRIVEN CRIMES , 2003 .

[19]  J. Caulkins.  Domestic Geographic Variation in Illicit Drug Prices , 1995 .

[20]  Crime.,et al.  Crime, Violence, and Development : Trends, Costs, and Policy Options in the Caribbean , 2007 .

[21]  L. Tajoli,et al.  The World Trade Network , 2011 .

[22]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[23]  Siddharth Chandra,et al.  What the price data tell us about heroin flows across Europe , 2013 .

[24]  Matthew C. Mahutga.  The Persistence of Structural Inequality?: A Network Analysis of International Trade, 1965-2000 , 2006 .

[25]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[26]  From Cali to Rotterdam: Perceptions of Colombian cocaine traffickers on the Dutch port , 2002 .

[27]  Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy.  Opium: Uncovering the Politics of the Poppy , 2009 .

[28]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[29]  J. Caulkins,et al.  What Price Data Tell Us about Drug Markets , 1998 .

[30]  Brittany M. Bond,et al.  Marijuana Price Gradients , 2012 .

[31]  Rémi Boivin,et al.  Macrosocial Network Analysis: The Case of Transnational Drug Trafficking , 2014 .

[32]  P. Griffiths,et al.  EMCDDA annual report 2009: cocaine and heroin maintain firm hold on Europe's drug scene. , 2009, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[33]  Jeffrey A. Miron,et al.  The Effect of Drug Prohibition on Drug Prices: Evidence from the Markets for Cocaine and Heroin , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[34]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Betweenness centrality measures for directed graphs , 1994 .

[35]  Frederick Desroches,et al.  Research on Upper Level Drug Trafficking: A Review , 2007 .

[36]  Siddharth Chandra,et al.  How Powdered Cocaine Flows Across the United States , 2014 .

[37]  P. Gootenberg.  Andean Cocaine: The Making of a Global Drug , 2008 .

[38]  P. Reuter.  World drug report , 1998 .

[39]  N. Morris,et al.  Crime and justice : an annual review of research , 1980 .

[40]  Sangmoon Kim,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Globalization and Regionalization in International Trade: A Social Network Approach , 2002 .

[41]  Jonathan P. Caulkins,et al.  How Drug Enforcement Affects Drug Prices , 2010, Crime and Justice.

[42]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Advancing Stability and Reconciliation in Guinea-Bissau: Lessons from Africa's First Narco-State , 2013 .

[43]  John A. Sawyer,et al.  An econometric study of international trade flows , 1967 .

[44]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Inside Criminal Networks , 2008 .

[45]  P. Grauwe,et al.  Modelling the cocaine and heroin markets in the era of globalization and drug reduction policies , 2008 .

[46]  R. Boivin,et al.  Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy. , 2014, The International journal on drug policy.

[47]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  On the Resilience of Illegal Drug Markets , 2007 .

[48]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[49]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[50]  Kenneth W. Clements,et al.  Pricing and Packaging: The Case of Marijuana , 2006 .

[51]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Risks and Prices: An Economic Analysis of Drug Enforcement , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[52]  Philip A. Sinclair,et al.  Network centralization with the Gil Schmidt power centrality index , 2009, Soc. Networks.