Perceptions of Tonal Changes in Normal Laryngeal, Esophageal, and Artificial Laryngeal Male Cantonese Speakers

Listeners were asked to identify six tonal variations in the production of the syllables /ji/ and /si/ produced by 10 normal laryngeal (NL), 10 standard esophageal (SE), and 10 Servox-type electrolarynx (EL) Cantonese speakers. The purpose of the present study was to determine if alaryngeal Cantonese speakers could differentiate meanings associated with different tone levels. Results indicated that listeners’ identification of the six tones for each syllable produced by the SE speakers was similar in pattern to those produced by the NL speakers of Cantonese. For both NL and SE speech, the high-level, low-falling, and high-rising tones were perceived more accurately than the mid-level, low-level, and low-rising tones. Identification of the six tones for each syllable as produced by the EL speakers was significantly poorer due to the limitations of the electrolarynx.

[1]  J. Noll,et al.  Relationship of selected acoustic variables to judgments of esophageal speech , 1969 .

[2]  M Hyman,et al.  Relationship of Acoustic Parameters and Perceptual Ratings of Esophageal Speech , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  M. Ng,et al.  Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[4]  T. Shipp,et al.  Frequency, duration, and perceptual measures in relation to judgments of alaryngeal speech acceptability. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Kenneth L. Pike,et al.  Tone languages : a technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion , 1950 .

[6]  B Weinberg,et al.  Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[7]  J. Matthews,et al.  FACTORS RELATED TO SPEECH PROFICIENCY OF THE LARYNGECTOMIZED. , 1963, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[8]  M HYMAN,et al.  An experimental study of artificial-larynx and esophageal speech. , 1955, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[9]  R. L. McCroskey,et al.  The Relative Intelligibility of Esophageal Speech and Artificial-Larynx Speech , 1963 .

[10]  Robert F. Orlikoff,et al.  Evaluating Research in Communicative Disorders , 1996 .

[11]  J Lerman,et al.  A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise. , 1983, Journal of communication disorders.

[12]  R. Tikofsky,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF ESOPHAGEAL AND NORMAL SPEAKERS. , 1965, Folia phoniatrica.

[13]  T. Ching,et al.  Communication of lexical tones in Cantonese alaryngeal speech. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.