Compressed Scaling of Abstract Numerosity Representations in Adult Humans and Monkeys

There is general agreement that nonverbal animals and humans endowed with language possess an evolutionary precursor system for representing and comparing numerical values. However, whether nonverbal numerical representations in human and nonhuman primates are quantitatively similar and whether linear or logarithmic coding underlies such magnitude judgments in both species remain elusive. To resolve these issues, we tested the numerical discrimination performance of human subjects and two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in an identical delayed match-to-numerosity task for a broad range of numerosities from 1 to 30. The results demonstrate a noisy nonverbal estimation system obeying Weber's Law in both species. With average Weber fractions in the range of 0.51 and 0.60, nonverbal numerosity discriminations in humans and monkeys showed similar precision. Moreover, the detailed analysis of the performance distributions exhibited nonlinearly compressed numerosity representations in both primate species. However, the difference between linear and logarithmic scaling was less pronounced in humans. This may indicate a gradual transformation of a logarithmic to linear magnitude scale in human adults as the result of a cultural transformation process during the course of mathematical education.

[1]  E. Miller,et al.  Analog Numerical Representations in Rhesus Monkeys: Evidence for Parallel Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  W. Roberts.  Evidence that pigeons represent both time and number on a logarithmic scale , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Beran.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Quantity representation in children and rhesus monkeys: linear versus logarithmic scales. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Representations of visual proportions in the primate posterior parietal and prefrontal cortices , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[8]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[9]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[11]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.

[12]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Distinct Cerebral Pathways for Object Identity and Number in Human Infants , 2008, PLoS biology.

[14]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[16]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  R M Church,et al.  Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[19]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[24]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A Labeled-Line Code for Small and Large Numerosities in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Parker,et al.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  P. Gordon.  Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[27]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[28]  T. G.,et al.  Number: the Language of Science , 1931, Nature.

[29]  William A. Roberts,et al.  How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Tobias Dantzig,et al.  Number: the Language of Science , 1931 .

[32]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[33]  David A Washburn,et al.  Nonverbal Estimation during Numerosity Judgements by Adult Humans , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[35]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[36]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[37]  S. Dehaene.  Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.

[38]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students , 2007, PLoS biology.

[39]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[40]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Enumeration of briefly presented items by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens) , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[41]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[42]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[43]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  S. Stevens.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law , 2008 .

[45]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elemente der Psychophysik / vol. 1 , 1889 .

[46]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale , 2001, Psychological science.

[50]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Enumeration Processes in the Primate Parietal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[51]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[52]  A. Nieder.  Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[54]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.