The Influence of Motor Processes on Attitudes Toward Novel Versus Familiar Semantic Stimuli

Recent research has suggested that the motor processes elicited by upper arm isometric flexion and extension can subtly influence attitudes. Specifically, ideographs evaluatively categorized while performing isometric upper arm flexion were subsequently preferred to ideographs evaluatively categorized while performing isometric upper arm extension. The present research sought to replicate this attitudinal effect with semantic stimuli and to examine a theoretical boundary condition posited by the elaboration likelihood model (ELM). Subjects categorized either neutral words or pronounceable nonwords while adopting the isometric positions. Results indicated that motor processes influenced subsequent attitudes toward stimuli with few associations (i.e., nonwords) more than toward stimuli with many associations in memory (i.e., familiar words). These results are consistent with a growing literature on the possible influence of nondeclarative (e.g., procedural) knowledge on attitudes.

[1]  J. Doyle,et al.  Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: II. EEG frequency analysis. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[2]  R. Petty,et al.  Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. , 1992 .

[3]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  On the Functional Value of Attitudes: The Influence of Accessible Attitudes on the Ease and Quality of Decision Making , 1992 .

[4]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[5]  J. Sivacek,et al.  Vested interest as a moderator of attitude–behavior consistency. , 1982 .

[6]  W. Wilson,et al.  Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. , 1979 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[9]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[10]  J. Riskind.  They stoop to conquer: Guiding and self-regulatory functions of physical posture after success and failure. , 1984 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Neurobehavioral Organization and the Cardinal Principle of Evaluative Bivalence a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Tomaka,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[17]  F. Strack,et al.  Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[19]  R. Ornstein,et al.  Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: an EEG study. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Classical Conditioning of Consumer Attitudes: Four Experiments in an Advertising Context , 1987 .

[21]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high , 1992 .

[22]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[23]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message Repetition on Argument Processing, Recall, and Persuasion , 1989 .

[24]  S. Fiske,et al.  The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition , 1983 .

[25]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[26]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. , 1987 .

[27]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[29]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. , 1977 .