Free and open-source software: Opening and democratising e-government's black box

This article considers the implications that the use of free and open-source software in government might have for democracy and public participation. From a constructionist perspective, the democratic 'effects' of non-proprietary software are contingent on how the practice of free and open-source software is discursively represented and constituted as it is translated into new e-government systems. On these premises, an analysis of official discourse and government policy for non-proprietary software suggests that its introduction into government will bring more 'politics as usual' rather than democratisation. Nevertheless, on the basis of an alternative discourse of ethics and freedom evident in the Free Software and Open Source communities, the authors of this paper envisage circumstances in which the discourse and practice of non-proprietary software contribute to opening-up and democratising e-government, by protecting and extending transparency and accountability in e-governments and by offering scope for technology to be shaped by citizens and associations as well as by administrators and private interests.

[1]  Giles Moss,et al.  The Libre Culture Manifesto , 2005 .

[2]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political , 1996 .

[3]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Reflections on trusting trust , 1984, CACM.

[4]  David A. Wheeler,et al.  Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! , 2005 .

[5]  Glyn Moody,et al.  Rebel Code: Linux and the Open Source Revolution , 2001 .

[6]  Monika Schnitzer,et al.  Public Subsidies for Open Source? Some Economic Policy Issues of the Software Market , 2002 .

[7]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Governance Initiatives Creating a Demand-Driven E-Commerce Approach: The Case of Denmark , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[9]  Matthew Fuller,et al.  Behind the Blip: Essays on the Culture of Software , 2003 .

[10]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Fishing for Fun and Profit? National Domestication of Multimedia: The Case of Norway , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Jens Hoff,et al.  Technology and social change: The path between technological determinism, social constructivism and new institutionalism , 2000 .

[12]  Lauren Ruth Wiener.  Digital woes - why we should not depend on software , 1993 .

[13]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Socio-Technical Design , 2004 .

[14]  Chris DiBona,et al.  Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution , 1999 .

[15]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Informed consent in the Mozilla browser: implementing value-sensitive design , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[17]  Nikolai Bezroukov,et al.  Open Source Software Development as a Special Type of Academic Research (Critique of Vulgar Raymondism) , 1999, First Monday.

[18]  A. Feenberg.  Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited , 2002 .

[19]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[20]  D HerbslebJames,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development , 2002 .

[21]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[22]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[23]  Hans K. Klein,et al.  Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[24]  Dan S. Wallach,et al.  Analysis of an electronic voting system , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004.

[25]  Jean Louise Cohen,et al.  Civil Society and Political Theory , 2020, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[26]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  The GNU manifesto , 1990 .

[27]  A. Chadwick.  Bringing E-Democracy Back In , 2003 .

[28]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[29]  Elisabeth Richard,et al.  Tools of governance , 2005 .

[30]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[31]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Homesteading the Noosphere , 1998, First Monday.

[32]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[33]  David M. Berry,et al.  The contestation of code , 2004 .

[34]  Michel Foucault,et al.  The Order of Things , 2010 .

[35]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  How computer systems embody values , 2001, Computer.

[36]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .