Predicting tunnel squeezing with incomplete data using Bayesian networks

Tunnel squeezing or time-dependent large deformations due to creep are common in tunnels constructed in weak rock masses at large depth or subjected to high horizontal in situ stresses in tectonically active regions. Squeezing can produce tunnel collapses, budget overruns and construction delays, and being able to predict squeezing is therefore important. This study presents a novel application of Bayesian networks (BNs) to predict squeezing. In particular, we employ a Naive Bayes classifier based on five parameters – support stiffness (K), Rock Tunneling Quality Index (Q), tunnel depth (H), tunnel diameter (D), and strength–stress ratio (SSR) – about which information is commonly available at early design stages. The Naive Bayes classifier is “learned”, using the Expectation Maximization algorithm, with a database of 166 tunneling case histories from 7 countries compiled by the authors which is provided as Supplementary material. Then, the Junction Tree algorithm is employed for “belief updating”; i.e., to predict the probability of tunnel squeezing for a given set of (probably incomplete) evidence. The model is validated using 10-fold cross-validation and also using an additional set of case-histories that had not been originally employed to learn the network. Results show that, when compared with other available criteria, the error rate of our BN is among the lowest, but with the advantage that it is able to provide predictions even with incomplete data. Results of a sensitivity analysis to assess the importance of input parameters on the squeezing outcome are also presented. And, finally, a web-based implementation of the proposed BN is provided to improve the ease-of-use of our approach.

[1]  Yi Li,et al.  Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network: A case study in Beichuan, China , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  I. Makin,et al.  Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka , 2003 .

[3]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part II. Diagnosis of a specific distressed dam , 2011 .

[4]  J. Chern,et al.  Tunneling in Squeezing Ground , 1998 .

[5]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[6]  Olivier Pourret,et al.  Bayesian networks : a practical guide to applications , 2008 .

[7]  Harry Zhang,et al.  The Optimality of Naive Bayes , 2004, FLAIRS.

[8]  Bhawani Singh,et al.  Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality , 1992 .

[9]  Herbert H. Einstein,et al.  Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian Networks: Porto Metro case study , 2011 .

[10]  G. Khanlari,et al.  Engineering geological study of the second part of water supply Karaj to Tehran tunnel with emphasis on squeezing problems , 2012 .

[11]  Farrokh Nadim,et al.  Stochastic design of an early warning system , 2008 .

[12]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems , 1995 .

[13]  K. K. Panthi,et al.  Analysis of the plastic deformation behavior of schist and schistose mica gneiss at Khimti headrace tunnel, Nepal , 2014, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[14]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Underground excavations in rock , 1980 .

[15]  N. Sitar,et al.  Inference of discontinuity trace length distributions using statistical graphical models , 2006 .

[16]  N. Barton THE INFLUENCE OF JOINT PROPERTIES IN MODELLING JOINTED ROCK MASSES , 1995 .

[17]  Ö. Aydan,et al.  The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels; Theory and prediction , 1993 .

[18]  Steven Broekx,et al.  A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Diagnosis of embankment dam distresses using Bayesian networks. Part I. Global-level characteristics based on a dam distress database , 2011 .

[20]  Nick Barton,et al.  Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support , 1974 .

[21]  N. Phienwej,et al.  Time-Dependent Response of Tunnels Considering Creep Effect , 2007 .

[22]  Judea Pearl,et al.  A Constraint-Propagation Approach to Probabilistic Reasoning , 1985, UAI.

[23]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of tunnel construction performance based on data , 2013 .

[24]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[25]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Big Tunnels in Bad Rock , 2001 .

[26]  D. Sterpi,et al.  Visco-Plastic Behaviour around Advancing Tunnels in Squeezing Rock , 2009 .

[27]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Slope safety evaluation by integrating multi-source monitoring information , 2014 .

[28]  Rafael Jimenez,et al.  A linear classifier for probabilistic prediction of squeezing conditions in Himalayan tunnels , 2011 .

[29]  Matthias Schubert,et al.  Risk assessment of road tunnels using Bayesian networks , 2012 .

[30]  Ebru Akcapinar Sezer,et al.  On sampling strategies for small and continuous data with the modeling of genetic programming and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system , 2012, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Bayesian network for characterizing model uncertainty of liquefaction potential evaluation models , 2012 .

[32]  Rajinder Bhasin,et al.  The use of stress-strength relationships in the assessment of tunnel stability , 1996 .

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[34]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[35]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems , 1990 .

[36]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[37]  David Heckerman,et al.  Bayesian Networks for Data Mining , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[38]  Gaetano Zazzaro,et al.  Bayesian Networks for Earthquake Magnitude Classification in a Early Warning System , 2012 .

[39]  A. K. Dube,et al.  Study of squeezing pressure phenomenon in a tunnell—II , 1986 .

[40]  Yujing Jiang,et al.  A new rheological model and its application in mountain tunnelling , 2008 .

[41]  E. Hoek,et al.  Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses , 2000 .

[42]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[43]  G. L. Shrestha,et al.  Stress Induced Problems in Himalayan Tunnels with Special Reference to Squeezing , 2006 .

[44]  Masanori Nakamura,et al.  Appraisal of companies with Bayesian networks , 2006, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min..

[45]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[47]  J. Cain,et al.  Application of belief networks to water management studies , 1999 .

[48]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Prediction of tunnel deformation in squeezing grounds , 2013 .

[49]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Computer science and data analysis series.

[50]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[51]  Chhatra Bahadur Basnet Evaluation on the Squeezing Phenomenon at the Headrace Tunnel of Chameliya Hydroelectric Project, Nepal , 2013 .

[52]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[53]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Networks , 2008, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[54]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Estimation of support pressure during tunnelling through squeezing grounds , 2014 .

[55]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.