Influence of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and PSA density on prostate cancer detection with contrast-enhanced sonography using contrast-tuned imaging technology.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and PSA density on prostate cancer detection with contrast-enhanced sonography using contrast-tuned imaging technology compared with baseline imaging (combination of grayscale and power Doppler imaging). METHODS In all, 161 patients were evaluated with grayscale, power Doppler, and contrast-tuned imaging. Biopsy was performed at 10 sites in each patient. When an abnormality was shown on any of these examinations, the biopsy was directed toward the abnormality. Cancer detection between contrast-tuned imaging and baseline imaging was compared for different subgroups according to PSA level (4-10, 10-20, and >20 ng/mL), prostate volume (<35, 35-50, 50-65, and >65 mL), and PSA density (<0.15, 0.15-0.30, 0.30-0.50, and >0.50). RESULTS In total, 413 sites were malignant in 78 patients. By biopsy site, the accuracy was greater for contrast-tuned imaging than for baseline imaging in all PSA level, prostate volume, and PSA density subgroups except 0.30 to 0.50 (all P < .05). Contrast-tuned imaging had significantly higher sensitivity in the subgroups with PSA levels between 4 and 20 ng/mL, prostate volumes between 35 and 65 mL, and PSA densities between 0.15 and 0.50 than baseline imaging (all P < .05); it also had significantly higher specificity for all PSA level subgroups except 10 to 20 ng/mL, all prostate volume subgroups except 35 to 50 mL, and all PSA density subgroups except 0.30 to 0.50 (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Contrast-tuned imaging could improve cancer detection over baseline imaging in patients with different PSA levels, prostate volumes, and PSA densities.

[1]  Alexandre Pelzer,et al.  Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances , 2008, European Radiology.

[2]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project. , 2008, European urology.

[3]  W. Horninger,et al.  Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection , 2010, European Radiology.

[4]  Seong Ho Park,et al.  Contrast-enhanced sonography for prostate cancer detection in patients with indeterminate clinical findings. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M. Blake,et al.  Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  Xavier Buy,et al.  Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[7]  G. Bartsch,et al.  The influence of prostate volume on prostate cancer detection using a combined approach of contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography‐targeted and systematic grey‐scale biopsy , 2007, BJU international.

[8]  G. Bartsch,et al.  A prospective randomized trial comparing contrast‐enhanced targeted versus systematic ultrasound guided biopsies: Impact on prostate cancer detection , 2005, The Prostate.

[9]  G. Andriole Saturation biopsies on autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer , 2009 .

[10]  F. Frauscher,et al.  Prostate: high-frequency Doppler US imaging for cancer detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[11]  D. Grignon,et al.  Correlation of color doppler flow in the prostate with tissue microvascularity , 1998, Cancer.

[12]  E. Halpern,et al.  Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2010, Urology.

[13]  R G Aarnink,et al.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of the human prostate: correlation with biopsy outcome. , 1999, Urology.

[14]  J. F. Seybolt Cancer detection. , 1974, Science.

[15]  D. Johnston,et al.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[16]  G Bartsch,et al.  Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Feng Hua Li,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography with contrast‐tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography , 2012, BJU international.

[18]  Jie Tang,et al.  Property and contrast-enhancement effects of lipid ultrasound contrast agent: a preliminary experimental study. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  W. Horninger,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography using cadence‐contrast pulse sequencing technology for targeted biopsy of the prostate , 2009, BJU international.

[20]  J. McKiernan,et al.  PSA updated: still relevant in the new millennium? , 2005, European urology.

[21]  E. Halpern,et al.  Prostate cancer: contrast-enhanced us for detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  John T. Wei,et al.  The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. , 1995, Urology.