Mandibular asymmetry: A proposal of radiographic analysis with public domain software

Objective This preliminary study aimed to propose a new analysis of digital panoramic radiographs for a differential diagnosis between functional and morphological mandibular asymmetry in children with and without unilateral posterior crossbite. Methods Analysis is based on linear and angular measurements taken from nine anatomic points, demarcated in sequence directly on digital images. A specific plug-in was developed as part of a larger public domain image processing software (ImageJ) to automate and facilitate measurements. Since panoramic radiographs are typically subject to magnification differences between the right and left sides, horizontal linear measurements were adjusted for greater accuracy in both sides by means of a Distortion Factor (DF). In order to provide a preliminary assessment of proposed analysis and the developed plug-in, radiographs of ten patients (5 with unilateral posterior crossbite and 5 with normal occlusion) were analyzed. Results Considerable divergence was found between the right and left sides in the measurements of mandibular length and position of condyles in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite in comparison to individuals with normal occlusion. Conclusion Although there are more effective and accurate diagnostic methods, panoramic radiography is still widespread, especially in emerging countries. This study presented initial evidence that the proposed analysis can be an important resource for planning early orthodontic intervention and, thus, avoid progression of asymmetries and their consequences.

[1]  A K Melnik,et al.  A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics , 2012 .

[3]  B. Söderfeldt,et al.  A systematic review concerning early orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite. , 2003, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  M Araki,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of a fibro-osseous lesion using binary images transformed from histopathological images. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  Senem Yiğit Özer,et al.  Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  T. Hansson,et al.  The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification. , 1987, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  G. Ramirez-Yañez,et al.  Prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in growing patients. , 2011, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  T. Uysal,et al.  Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and a normal occlusion sample. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  H. Oktay,et al.  Condylar asymmetry in bilateral posterior crossbite patients. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  P H Buschang,et al.  Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  S. Kaneko,et al.  Glenoid fossa responses to mandibular lateral shift in growing rats. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  G. Janson,et al.  Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion. , 2006, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[14]  I. Saatci,et al.  Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  H. Oktay,et al.  Condylar asymmetry in unilateral posterior crossbite patients. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  J. Årtun,et al.  Changes in condylar postition and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  L. Sillanmäki,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry in healthy children , 2005, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[18]  T. Uysal,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[19]  T. Peltomäki,et al.  Hemimandibular elongation: treatment and long-term follow-up. , 2008, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[20]  D. Aizenbud,et al.  Reliability of panoramic radiographs for the assessment of mandibular elongation after distraction osteogenesis procedures. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[21]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry. , 1988, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[22]  R. Tallents,et al.  A longitudinal study of normal asymmetric mandibular growth and its relationship to skeletal maturation. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  B. Thilander,et al.  A Study of Children with Unilateral Posterior Crossbite, Treated and Untreated, in the Deciduous Dentition Occlusal and Skeletal Characteristics of Significance in Predicting the Long-term Outcome , 2002, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[24]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Non-nutritive sucking habits, dental malocclusions, and facial morphology in Brazilian children: a longitudinal study. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[25]  F. Yaşar,et al.  Alveolar bone changes under overhanging restorations , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[27]  Senem Yig.  Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography , 2011 .

[28]  S. Bishara,et al.  Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Treatment of posterior crossbite comparing 2 appliances: a community-based trial. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  Paul W Major,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.