Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: The role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line

Does vision play a role in the elaboration of the semantic representation of small and large numerosities, notably in its spatial format? To investigate this issue, we decided to compare in the auditory modality the performance of congenitally and early blind people with that of a sighted control group, in two number comparison tasks (to 5 and to 55) and in one parity judgement task. Blind and sighted participants presented exactly the same distance and SNARC (Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes) effects, indicating that they share the same semantic numerical representation. In consequence, our results suggest that the spatial dimension of the numerical representation is not necessarily attributable to the visual modality and that the absence of vision does not preclude the elaboration of this representation for 1-digit (Experiment 1) and 2-digit numerosities (Experiment 2). Moreover, as classical semantic numerical effects were observed in the auditory modality, the postulate of the amodal nature of the mental number line for both small and large magnitudes was reinforced.

[1]  N. Newcombe.  The Nativist-Empiricist Controversy in the Context of Recent Research on Spatial and Quantitative Development , 2002, Psychological science.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  B. Jones,et al.  Spatial perception in the blind. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[4]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic priming in number naming , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  David Klahr,et al.  The role of quantification operators in the development of conservation of quantity , 1973 .

[9]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Rourke,et al.  Disabilities of Arithmetic and Mathematical Reasoning , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  E. Ochaíta,et al.  Spatial Representation by Persons who are Blind: A Study of the Effects of Learning and Development , 1993 .

[15]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  The Mental Number Line and the Human Angular Gyrus , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[18]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Spatial knowledge in blind and sighted children. , 1995, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[21]  D. Kimura.  Functional Asymmetry of the Brain in Dichotic Listening , 1967 .

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[23]  M. V. Senden,et al.  Space and Sight , 1962 .

[24]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[25]  M. Bryden.  An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. , 1988 .

[26]  T. Simon,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Origins of Number Knowledge: A "Non-Numerical" Account , 1997 .

[27]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  La bosse des maths , 1997 .

[30]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[31]  M. Heller.  Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  J. Gerstmann.  SYNDROME OF FINGER AGNOSIA, DISORIENTATION FOR RIGHT AND LEFT, AGRAPHIA AND ACALCULIA: LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC VALUE , 1940 .

[33]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  L. Hartlage.  Verbal tests of spatial conceptualization. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of numbers. , 2004 .

[39]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Language and the Origin of Numerical Concepts , 2004, Science.

[40]  A. Cross.  Insights from the Blind , 1979 .

[41]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[42]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Derrick Vail,et al.  Space and Sight , 1961 .

[44]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets , 2001 .

[45]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Dichotic listening performance and frontal lobe function. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  E. Mayer,et al.  A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  T. Simon,et al.  The foundations of numerical thinking in a brain without numbers , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[49]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[50]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  T. Hines,et al.  An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[52]  W. Fias,et al.  Semantic Influences on Feature-Based Attention Due to Overlap of Neural Circuits , 2002, Cortex.

[53]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[54]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Subitizing: The role of figural patterns in the development of numerical concepts. , 1982 .

[55]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[56]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Preschoolers' recognition of numerical equivalence: sequential sets. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.