Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE Decision aids (DAs) have been developed to improve communication between health professionals and patients, and to involve patients in decisions about their health care. Cancer-related decisions can be difficult due to problems in communicating complex information about prognosis and the modest benefits of available treatments. We conducted a systematic review of cancer-related DAs. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer-related DAs about screening, prevention, and treatment decision making were included. We completed a comprehensive literature search and conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses. We also conducted a meta regression to explore heterogeneity of effect estimates. RESULTS We identified 34 RCTs of DAs in a screening (n = 22 trials) or preventive/treatment (n = 12 trials) context. DAs significantly improved knowledge about screening options when compared to usual practice (weighted average effect size, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.73; P < .0001). A similar effect on knowledge was also found for preventive/treatment options (weighted average effect size, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P < .0001). Overall, general anxiety was not increased in most trials and was significantly reduced in a screening context. Decisional conflict was reduced overall but not when screening and preventive/treatment studies were analyzed separately. There were few differences between different types of DAs. CONCLUSION Cancer-related DAs are effective in increasing patient knowledge compared with usual practice without increasing anxiety particularly in the area of cancer screening. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of DAs in the prevention and treatment context.

[1]  Lenora E. Johnson,et al.  Educating African American Men about the Prostate Cancer Screening Dilemma: A Randomized Intervention , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  J. Ward,et al.  A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  P. Ubel,et al.  Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  K C Carriere,et al.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. , 1997, JAMA.

[6]  C. Charles,et al.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[7]  A. O'Connor,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  L. Kinsinger,et al.  Videotape-Based Decision Aid for Colon Cancer Screening , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Laura Esserman,et al.  Pilot Trial of a Computerized Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Prevention , 2007, The breast journal.

[10]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine , 2004, The Lancet.

[11]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[12]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  T. Hassard,et al.  Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  Robert J Volk,et al.  Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  J. Schorling,et al.  The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  R. Street,et al.  Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[18]  Katrina Armstrong,et al.  Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Lenora E. Johnson,et al.  Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2 , 2001, Cancer.

[20]  John B. Schorling,et al.  Does informed consent alter elderly patients’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening? , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[21]  T. Peters,et al.  Cluster-randomised trial of risk communication to enhance informed uptake of cervical screening. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[22]  Michael J Green,et al.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[24]  Elizabeth Lobb,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  M. Charlson,et al.  Is there a role for decision aids in cancer-related decisions? , 2007, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[26]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Decreased Use of Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Aid with Individualized Risk Information , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  W. Daal,et al.  Randomised trial of a decision aid and its timing for women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  J. Benkendorf,et al.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[30]  M. Schapira,et al.  The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[31]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of a Patient Decision Aid for Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[33]  Linda Fleisher,et al.  Facilitating Informed Decision Making about Breast Cancer Risk and Genetic Counseling Among Women Calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[34]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  R. Volk,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. , 1999, Archives of family medicine.

[37]  M. Rogers,et al.  Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  L. Lemyre,et al.  Is anxiety a suitable measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review? , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[39]  B. Biesecker,et al.  An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[40]  W. Daal,et al.  Randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention consisting of trade-offs and individualized treatment information for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[42]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. , 2006, Patient Education and Counseling.

[43]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[44]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[45]  Robert J Volk,et al.  Patient Education for Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[46]  P. Butow,et al.  Towards better communication in cancer care: a framework for developing evidence-based interventions. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[47]  T. Tammela,et al.  A randomized trial of choice of treatment in prostate cancer: the effect of intervention on the treatment chosen , 2004, BJU international.

[48]  C. Charles,et al.  Impact of cancer-related decision aids. , 2002, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[49]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Cancer patients' perceptions of their disease and its treatment. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  E. Bruera,et al.  Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  J. Ward,et al.  Original Paper: Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomised controlled trial , 2003 .

[52]  J. Kirk,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Decision Aid for Women at Increased Risk of Ovarian Cancer , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[53]  T. Wilt,et al.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[54]  P. Adab,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women’s willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[55]  L. Degner,et al.  Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. , 1997, Cancer nursing.

[56]  T. Tammela,et al.  A randomized trial of the choice of treatment in prostate cancer: design and baseline characteristics , 2001, BJU international.

[57]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[58]  Constantine Daskalakis,et al.  Preparing African-American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening. , 2005, Journal of the National Medical Association.