Rheumatologists' performance in daily practice

Objective. To assess rheumatologists’ performance for 8 rheumatologic conditions and to explore possible explanatory factors. Methods. After written informed consent was obtained, 27 rheumatologists (21% of all Dutch rheumatologists) practicing in 16 outpatient departments were each visited by 8 incognito “standardized patients” (SPs). The diagnoses of these 8 cases account for about 23% of all new referred patients in the Netherlands. Results for ordered lab tests as well as real radiographs with corresponding results from a radiologist were simulated. Information from the visits was obtained from the SPs, who completed predefined case-specific checklists, and by collecting data on resource utilization. Feedback was provided. Results. Altogether 254 encounters took place, of which 201 were first visits and 53 were followup visits. SPs were unmasked twice during a visit. There was considerable variation in resource utilization (lab tests and imaging) between cases and between rheumatologists. Mean costs per rheumatologist ranged from US $ 4.67 to $ 65.36 per visit for lab tests and from US $ 33.15 to $ 226.84 per visit for imaging tests. No significant correlations were seen between resource utilization costs and number of years of clinical experience or performance on checklist scores. Rheumatologists with longer experience had lower total item checklist scores (r 52 0.47; P < 0.05). Conclusion. A considerable variation in resource utilization was found among 27 Dutch rheumatologists. The information obtained is an excellent source for discussion on the appropriateness of care. Arthritis Care Res 45:16 ‐27, 2001. © 2001 by the American College of Rheumatology.

[1]  L. Bouter,et al.  Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review , 2002, Pain.

[2]  Cees van der Vleuten,et al.  Developing Case‐specific Checklists for Standardized‐patient—Based Assessments in Internal Medicine: A Review of the Literature , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  L. Gundersen The effect of clinical practice guidelines on variations in care. , 2000, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Medical practice variations: changing the theoretical approach: leading article , 1999 .

[5]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Medical practice variations: changing the theoretical approach , 1999, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[6]  J. Rethans Needs assessment in continuing medical education through standardized patients , 1998 .

[7]  H. Valkenburg,et al.  National database of patients visiting rheumatologists in The Netherlands: the standard diagnosis register of rheumatic diseases. A report and preliminary analysis. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[8]  J. Carline,et al.  History-taking and preventive medicine skills among primary care physicians: an assessment using standardized patients. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  A D Oxman,et al.  Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[10]  H. Barrows An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  First‐visit bias in the measurement of clinical competence with standardized patients , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  F Sturmans,et al.  Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice. , 1991, BMJ.

[13]  F Sturmans,et al.  Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients. , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  D. Hanley,et al.  Dealing with geographic variations in the use of hospitals. The experience of the Maine Medical Assessment Foundation Orthopaedic Study Group. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  S. van der Linden,et al.  How to introduce incognito standardized patients into outpatient clinics of specialists in rheumatology. , 2001, Medical teacher.

[16]  J. Rethans,et al.  Assessment of practicing family physicians: comparison of observation in a multiple-station examination using standardized patients with observation of consultations in daily practice. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  N. Dolan,et al.  Using Unidentified Standardized Patients to Evaluate Housestaff Delivery of Preventive Services , 1997 .

[18]  S Westin,et al.  Methods for quality assessment in general practice. , 1996, Family practice.