DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9

Formation of anterior structures in the Drosophila embryo requires the product of the gene bicoid. The bicoid protein contains a homeodomain and may exert its effects in early development by regulating transcription of the gap gene, hunchback (hb). Consistent with this view, we have demonstrated that DNA-bound Bicoid fusion proteins stimulate gene expression. We used the gene activation phenotype in yeast to study DNA recognition by the Bicoid homeodomain. We found that a single amino acid replacement at position 9 of the recognition helix was sufficient to switch the DNA specificity of the Bicoid protein. The altered specificity Bicoid mutants recognized DNA sites bound by Ultrabithorax, fushi tarazu, and other related homeo-domain proteins. Our results suggest that DNA specificity in Bicoid and Antennapedia class proteins is determined by recognition helix residue 9.

[1]  L. Guarente,et al.  Fusion of Escherichia coli lacZ to the cytochrome c gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  Jeffrey H. Miller.  Experiments in molecular genetics , 1972 .

[4]  R. Sauer,et al.  Protein-DNA recognition. , 1984, Annual review of biochemistry.

[5]  A. Laughon,et al.  Sequence of a Drosophila segmentation gene: protein structure homology with DNA-binding proteins , 1984, Nature.

[6]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of the inducible divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[7]  W. Gehring,et al.  Homeo boxes in the study of development. , 1987, Science.

[8]  C. Ingles,et al.  The Drosophila fushi tarazu polypeptide is a DNA-binding transcriptional activator in yeast cells , 1989, Nature.

[9]  K. Murata,et al.  Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. , 1987, Science.

[11]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  Signal transduction and transcriptional regulation by glucocorticoid receptor-LexA fusion proteins. , 1988, Science.

[12]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Isolation and sequence‐specific DNA binding of the Antennapedia homeodomain. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[13]  T. Kunkel.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  N. Seeman,et al.  Sequence-specific Recognition of Double Helical Nucleic Acids by Proteins (base Pairs/hydrogen Bonding/recognition Fidelity/ion Binding) , 2022 .

[15]  M Ptashne,et al.  Mechanism of action of the lexA gene product. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Kelly,et al.  In vitro translocation of organelles along microtubules , 1985, Cell.

[17]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Changing the binding specificity of a repressor by redesigning an alpha-helix. , 1985, Nature.

[18]  Y. Jan,et al.  Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[19]  Jun Ma,et al.  A new class of yeast transcriptional activators , 1987, Cell.

[20]  M. Hall,et al.  Homeo domain of the yeast repressor alpha 2 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain but is not sufficient for repression. , 1987, Science.

[21]  M. Scott,et al.  The structure and function of the homeodomain. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  H. Horvitz,et al.  The C. elegans cell lineage and differentiation gene unc-86 encodes a protein with a homeodomain and extended similarity to transcription factors , 1988, Cell.

[23]  Jun Ma,et al.  Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments , 1987, Cell.

[24]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[25]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Activation and repression of transcription by homoeodomain-containing proteins that bind a common site , 1988, Nature.

[26]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Specific DNA binding of GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast , 1985, Cell.

[27]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[28]  R. Schleif,et al.  DNA binding by proteins. , 1988, Science.

[29]  W. Herr,et al.  The ubiquitous octamer-binding protein Oct-1 contains a POU domain with a homeo box subdomain. , 1988, Genes & development.

[30]  B. Matthews,et al.  The molecular basis of DNA–protein recognition inferred from the structure of cro repressor , 1982, Nature.

[31]  L. Staudt,et al.  A human protein specific for the immunoglobulin octamer DNA motif contains a functional homeobox domain , 1988, Cell.

[32]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Structure of the operator-binding domain of bacteriophage lambda repressor: implications for DNA recognition and gene regulation. , 1983, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[33]  H. Fritz,et al.  The gapped duplex DNA approach to oligonucleotide-directed mutation construction. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  R. Brent,et al.  Gene activation and DNA binding by Drosophila Ubx and abd-A proteins , 1989, Cell.

[35]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The Drosophila developmental gene, engrailed, encodes a sequence-specific DNA binding activity , 1985, Nature.

[36]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes , 1987, Nature.

[37]  P N Goodfellow,et al.  A Genetic Switch: Gene Control and Phage λ , 1987 .

[38]  M. Levine,et al.  Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[39]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  A new-specificity mutant of 434 repressor that defines an amino acid–base pair contact , 1987, Nature.

[40]  R. Brent,et al.  A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor , 1985, Cell.

[41]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  A repressor (MATα2 product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast , 1985, Cell.

[42]  R. Brent,et al.  A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene. , 1985, Nature.

[43]  R. Sauer,et al.  The N-terminal arms of λ repressor wrap around the operator DNA , 1982, Nature.

[44]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .

[45]  M. Levine,et al.  DNA-binding activities of the Drosophila melanogaster even-skipped protein are mediated by its homeo domain and influenced by protein context , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Homologous interactions of λ repressor and λ Cro with the λ operator , 1986, Cell.

[47]  A. Radford.  Methods in yeast genetics — A laboratory course manual by M Rose, F Winston and P Hieter. pp 198. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 1990. $34 ISBN 0‐87969‐354‐1 , 1991 .

[48]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Secondary structure determination for the Antennapedia homeodomain by nuclear magnetic resonance and evidence for a helix‐turn‐helix motif. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[49]  G. Ruvkun,et al.  The POU domain: a large conserved region in the mammalian pit-1, oct-1, oct-2, and Caenorhabditis elegans unc-86 gene products. , 1988, Genes & development.

[50]  M. Krasnow,et al.  An Ultrabithorax protein binds sequences near its own and the Antennapedia P1 promoters , 1988, Cell.

[51]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Separation of DNA binding from the transcription-activating function of a eukaryotic regulatory protein. , 1986, Science.

[52]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Transcription activation by the adenovirus E1a protein , 1989, Nature.

[53]  W. Schaffner,et al.  A cloned octamer transcription factor stimulates transcription from lymphoid–specific promoters in non–B cells , 1988, Nature.

[54]  K. Struhl,et al.  Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of Yeast , 1986, Cell.

[55]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[56]  R. Tjian,et al.  Cloning and expression of AP-2, a cell-type-specific transcription factor that activates inducible enhancer elements. , 1988, Genes & development.

[57]  C. S. Parker,et al.  Transcriptional activation by the SV40 AP-1 recognition element in yeast is mediated by a factor similar to AP-1 that is distinct from GCN4 , 1988, Cell.

[58]  R. Roeder,et al.  A human lymphoid- specific transcription factor that activates immunoglobulin genes is a homoeobox protein , 1988, Nature.

[59]  R. Tjian,et al.  Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals mutiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif , 1988, Cell.

[60]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Pole region-dependent repression of the Drosophila gap gene Krüppel by maternal gene products , 1987, Cell.

[61]  J. Vieira,et al.  Production of single-stranded plasmid DNA. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[62]  W. Herr,et al.  The POU domain is a bipartite DNA-binding structure , 1988, Nature.

[63]  P. Ingham.  The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[64]  M. Noll,et al.  Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network , 1986, Cell.

[65]  P. Sorger,et al.  Yeast heat shock factor is an essential DNA-binding protein that exhibits temperature-dependent phosphorylation , 1988, Cell.

[66]  E. Brown,et al.  Substituting an α-helix switches the sequence-specific DNA interactions of a repressor , 1984, Cell.

[67]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Developmental and molecular analysis of Deformed; a homeotic gene controlling Drosophila head development , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[68]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  The interaction of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[69]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres , 1988, Nature.

[70]  Jordan,et al.  Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions , 1988, Science.

[71]  M Ptashne,et al.  Recognition of a DNA operator by the repressor of phage 434: a view at high resolution , 1988, Science.

[72]  M. Ptashne.  A Genetic Switch , 1986 .

[73]  R. Brent,et al.  Regulation and autoregulation by lexA protein. , 1982, Biochimie.

[74]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[75]  W. J. Gehring,et al.  A conserved DNA sequence in homoeotic genes of the Drosophila Antennapedia and bithorax complexes , 1984, Nature.

[76]  R. Brent,et al.  DNA-bound Fos proteins activate transcription in yeast , 1988, Cell.

[77]  H. Mihara,et al.  A chemically synthesized Antennapedia homeo domain binds to a specific DNA sequence , 1988, Science.

[78]  D Bopp,et al.  The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[79]  M. Delorenzi,et al.  Drosophila homoeotic genes encode transcriptional activators similar to mammalian OTF-2 , 1988, Nature.

[80]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Heat shock factor is regulated differently in yeast and HeLa cells , 1987, Nature.

[81]  M. Ptashne,et al.  How λ repressor and λ Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3 , 1986, Cell.

[82]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction , 1988, Cell.