'Pretty Lights' and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems

University classes in Mathematics are traditionally perceived to be uninspiring and devoid of active student-lecturer communication. Large undergraduate classes further compound the difficulty of engaging students and enabling viable student-lecturer feedback. At the Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University, some staff members have been using electronic voting systems (EVS) to enliven the classroom and enable large numbers of students to respond to questions in real time during class. In this paper, we present an evaluation case study, based on student perceptions, of the impact of EVS use on student learning and engagement. The results show that majority of students are hugely positive about the usefulness and overall advantageousness of EVS use in classes. Results also show that EVS use does increase the likelihood of students participating and engaging in class, as even students who do not view EVS as being particularly useful stated that they are more likely to participate in classes where EVS are used than otherwise. However, there seems to be no correlation between EVS use and improvement (or otherwise) in student grades.

[1]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[2]  David A. Banks,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. , 2006 .

[3]  Quintin Cutts,et al.  Electronically enhanced classroom interaction , 2002 .

[4]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[5]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[6]  Scott R. Homan,et al.  Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes , 2008 .

[7]  M. Oliver,et al.  Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice , 2007 .

[8]  James Boyle,et al.  Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings , 2003 .

[9]  Jones Matt,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education , 1970 .

[10]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Assessing-To-Learn: Formative Assessment in Physics Instruction , 2004 .

[11]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[12]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Classroom Response and Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory , 2004 .

[13]  Debra Macfarlane-Dick,et al.  Rethinking Formative Assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2008 .

[14]  L. V. Dijk,et al.  Interactive lectures in engineering education , 2001 .

[15]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[16]  V. Simpson,et al.  Using Electronic Voting Systems in Lectures , 2005 .

[17]  Quintin I. Cutts,et al.  Maximising Dialogue in Lectures using Group Response Systems , 2004, CATE.

[18]  Andrew Gavrin,et al.  Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology , 1999 .

[19]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  Mark Russell Using an electronic voting system to enhance learning and teaching , 2008 .

[22]  Thomas A. Angelo,et al.  Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Second Edition. , 1993 .

[23]  John Barnett,et al.  Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions , 2006 .

[24]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[25]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms , 2002 .

[26]  Douglas Duncan,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems , 2004 .