Validity of patient self-reported history of skin cancer.

OBJECTIVE To determine the validity of patient self-report of skin cancer history. DESIGN A cohort of patients was randomly selected from the case group in a prior case-control study involving skin cancer, and a second cohort was randomly selected from the controls of that study. Patient self-reported history (as determined by responses to a survey) was compared with the gold standard of chart documentation of a pathology report or a procedure note from Mohs micrographic surgery demonstrating skin cancer. SETTING University-based outpatient dermatology clinic. PATIENTS Three hundred patients were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patients were considered to have correctly classified their skin cancer history if their self-reported history was consistent with chart documentation. RESULTS We obtained chart information for 258 patients.Of those patients, 183 (70.9%) had chart documentation of nonmelanoma skin cancer, and 16 (6.2%) had chart documentation of a melanoma. Using chart documentation as the gold standard, we found that patients correctly identified their basal cell carcinoma status in 84.3% of cases; their squamous cell carcinoma status in 81.5% of cases; their overall nonmelanoma skin cancer status in 91.8% of cases; their melanoma status in 94.8% of cases; and their overall skin cancer status in 92.6% of cases. Patients' self-reported history of skin cancer of any type had a positive predictive value of 95.1% and a negative predictive value of 85.9%. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported history of skin cancer had a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and a high positive and negative predictive value within the study population. Obtaining medical information by patient report appears to be a useful tool for determining medical history of skin cancer.

[1]  A Norrish,et al.  Validity of self-reported hospital admission in a prospective study. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  W. Willett,et al.  Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  L. Fielding,et al.  The association between melanoma, lymphoma, and other primary neoplasms. , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[4]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Comparing self-reported and physician-reported medical history. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  P. Hall,et al.  Non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma and skin malignancies‐shared etiology? , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[6]  R. Honkanen,et al.  Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  U. Ringborg,et al.  Second primary cancers in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: A population‐based study in Sweden , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[8]  D. Margolis,et al.  The lack of a relationship between atopic dermatitis and nonmelanoma skin cancers. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  J. Tu,et al.  Problems for clinical judgement: 2. Obtaining a reliable past medical history. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  P. Stolley,et al.  Agreement rates between oral contraceptive users and prescribers in relation to drug use histories. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  David R. Smith,et al.  Errors and correlates in parental recall of child immunizations: effects on vaccination coverage estimates. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[12]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[13]  M. Zins,et al.  Factors associated with self-reporting of chronic health problems in the French GAZEL cohort. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  T. Bush,et al.  Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[15]  P Oja,et al.  Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseases in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  D. Margolis,et al.  Mail surveys can achieve high response rates in a dermatology patient population. , 2004, The Journal of investigative dermatology.