For they know not what they do? Target memory and metacognitive monitoring of self-disclosures on social networking sites

Abstract To adequately weigh the risks and benefits of self-disclosures on Social Networking Sites (SNS), it is pivotal for users to be aware of the current status of their digital privacy. Cognitive and metacognitive factors seem necessary in this context, for example target memory about who exactly has access to exactly which pieces of information and metacognitive monitoring of the status of one’s own target memory. Transferring paradigms from basic memory and metacognition research, we systematically investigated the impact of risk cues on these variables: In Experiment 1 ninety-eight young SNS users repeatedly disclosed personal or impersonal information (between-subject: information intimacy) to large or small audiences (within-subject: audience size). Afterwards their target memory was assessed and they gave metacognitive confidence judgments regarding each answer. Results indicate that participants remembered well if they had disclosed something but struggled with target memory (correct association between content and specific audience), an effect that was mirrored regarding metacognitive monitoring. Importantly participants’ target memory was significantly better under conditions of risk (personal information, large audience), but they were not metacognitively aware of these risk effects. Experiment 2 (N = 59) replicated the audience size effects and confirmed that these were not artifacts of visual salience.

[1]  P. Allain,et al.  Destination memory in Alzheimer’s Disease: When I imagine telling Ronald Reagan about Paris , 2013, Cortex.

[2]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  To disclose or not: publicness in social networking sites , 2011, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[4]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Audience visualization influences disclosures in online social networks , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Extent of private information disclosure on online social networks: An exploration of Facebook mobile phone users , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[7]  S. Petronio Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[8]  D. Dunning 4. Confidence considered: assessing the quality of decisions and performance , 2012 .

[9]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky , 2009, Psychological science.

[10]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  Destination memory impairment in older people. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[12]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[13]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Understanding cumulative risk , 2009 .

[15]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Annie Lang,et al.  It's the Product: Do Risky Products Compel Attention and Elicit Arousal in Media Users? , 2005, Health communication.

[17]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[18]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Trust into Collective Privacy? The Role of Subjective Theories for Self-Disclosure in Online Communication , 2014 .

[19]  Jo Bryce,et al.  The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples' online interactions , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Thomas Forkmann,et al.  Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors , 2014, Psychological research.

[21]  Eileen Wood,et al.  All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Atsunobu Suzuki,et al.  Enhanced memory for the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Facial trustworthiness modulates face-trait associative memory , 2010, Cognition.

[23]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. , 2012, Psychological review.

[24]  S. Desmarais,et al.  Risky Disclosures on Facebook , 2012 .

[25]  A. Koriat,et al.  The contextualization of input and output events in memory , 1991 .

[26]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Subjective confidence in one's answers: the consensuality principle. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  K. Strater,et al.  Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community , 2008 .

[28]  D. Sperber,et al.  Epistemic Vigilance , 2010 .

[29]  S. Jourard,et al.  Some factors in self-disclosure. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Episodic memory storage and retrieval: Insights from electrophysiological measures , 2007 .

[31]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Competent or clueless? Users' knowledge and misconceptions about their online privacy management , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  D. Mackie,et al.  False fame, perceptual clarity, or persuasion? Flexible fluency attribution in spokesperson familiarity effects , 2009 .

[34]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  S. Pieschl,et al.  Beware of Publicity! Perceived Distress of Negative Cyber Incidents and Implications for Defining Cyberbullying , 2015 .

[36]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Reciprocal Self-Disclosure in Internet-Based Surveys , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Tracking conversational repetition: an evaluation of target monitoring ability , 2006 .

[38]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[40]  S. Pieschl Metacognitive calibration—an extended conceptualization and potential applications , 2009 .

[41]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[42]  R. Petty,et al.  Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes , 2015, Cognition & emotion.

[43]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[44]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Sharing in the Dark? Target Memory and Risk Awareness in Online Communication , 2013, CogSci.

[45]  Rebecca Dredge,et al.  Presentation on Facebook and risk of cyberbullying victimisation , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Positive and Negative Generation Effects in Source Monitoring , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  A. Todorov,et al.  Memory for faces: the effect of facial appearance and the context in which the face is encountered , 2015, Psychological research.

[48]  P. Slovic What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short‐term and long‐term consequences of smoking , 2000 .

[49]  Alison Attrill,et al.  Revealing only the superficial me: Exploring categorical self-disclosure online , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Destination Memory Stop Me if I’ve Told You This Before , 2022 .

[51]  A. Koriat,et al.  Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. , 1999 .

[52]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[53]  R. Marsh,et al.  Comparisons of target output monitoring and source input monitoring , 2002 .

[54]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy , 1996 .

[55]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item. Comments on Schraw (1995) , 1996 .

[56]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  THE ROLE OF AFFECT IN THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL OF PERSUASION , 2015 .

[57]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Suppressing Secrecy Through Metacognitive Ease , 2009, Psychological science.

[58]  D. Boyd Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[59]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.