Extending social responsibility to small and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Abstract Buying firms’ sales and reputation will be greatly damaged by any non-responsible behaviors on the part of suppliers, especially when those suppliers, like small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), have restricted resources and capabilities. To eradicate these risks, a growing number of buying firms have introduced socially responsible supplier development (SRSD). SRSD, including monitoring and evaluating suppliers, can provide them with incentives and assistance. Based on configuration theory and contingency theory, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is adopted in this study to examine how SRSD practices adopted by buying firms, supply chain partnership, and market turbulence affect the corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of their SME suppliers. We find that, as core factors, supplier monitoring, supplier assistance, and supply chain partnership can work together with peripheral conditions to achieve superior CSR performance. In addition, even at different levels of market turbulence, superior CSR performance can be realized through different causal configurations.

[1]  P. Danese,et al.  Drivers and enablers of supplier sustainability practices: a survey-based analysis , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[2]  J. Proth,et al.  Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing , 2005 .

[3]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?: , 1994 .

[4]  Patrick A. Mello Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2014 .

[5]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations , 2014 .

[6]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[7]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[8]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Partnership Quality and Supply Chain Performance: Moderating Role of Risks, and Environmental Uncertainty , 2011 .

[9]  David T. Wilson An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships , 1995 .

[10]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Carrots or Sticks? Improving Social and Environmental Compliance at Suppliers Through Incentives and Penalties , 2015 .

[11]  C. Giménez,et al.  Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[12]  Hiram M. Samel,et al.  Production Goes Global, Compliance Stays Local: Private Regulation in the Global Electronics Industry , 2015 .

[13]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[14]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Supplier involvement in the fuzzy front end of new product development: An investigation of homophily, benevolence and market turbulence , 2016 .

[15]  Douglas M. Lambert,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance , 2004 .

[16]  Sandra Rothenberg,et al.  Suppliers and Environmental Innovation: The Automotive Paint Process , 2000 .

[17]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[18]  G. Silva,et al.  The role of motivations and involvement in wine tourists' intention to return: SEM and fsQCA findings , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[19]  Martin Müller,et al.  Supplier management in developing countries , 2013 .

[20]  Roger Calantone,et al.  A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms' Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[21]  Sachin B. Modi,et al.  Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[22]  A. Ghobadian,et al.  Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: an empirical examination , 2012 .

[23]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[24]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development , 2016 .

[25]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .

[26]  Judith M. Whipple,et al.  Relationship Quality and Performance Outcomes: Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[27]  A. Michael Knemeyer,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN PARTNERSHIPS: MODEL VALIDATION AND IMPLEMENTATION , 2004 .

[28]  J. Aguilera‐Caracuel,et al.  How Corporate Social Responsibility Helps MNEs to Improve their Reputation. The Moderating Effects of Geographical Diversification and Operating in Developing Regions , 2018 .

[29]  Damodar Suar,et al.  Do stakeholder management strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies , 2010 .

[30]  S. X. Zeng,et al.  Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach , 2016 .

[31]  Martin J. Liu,et al.  Reprint of “Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: The mediating role of guanxi”☆ , 2015 .

[32]  Duygu Turker Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study , 2009 .

[33]  Cristina Giménez Thomsen,et al.  Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence from Germany , 2011 .

[34]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: a SME perspective , 2008 .

[36]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supply chain partnerships: Opportunities for operations research , 1997 .

[37]  T. Lewis,et al.  Developing Long-Term Voluntary Partnerships with Suppliers to Achieve Sustainable Quality , 2017 .

[38]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  COLLABORATION AND EVALUATION IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE IMPACT ON PLANT‐LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENT , 2003 .

[39]  D. Wood Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review , 2010 .

[40]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence , 2015 .

[41]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  X. Luo,et al.  Whose Call to Answer: Institutional Complexity and Firms’ CSR Reporting , 2017 .

[43]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[44]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Socially responsible supplier development: Construct development and measurement validation , 2012 .

[45]  R. Klassen,et al.  Drivers and Enablers That Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains , 2008 .

[46]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[47]  Bouchra M’Zali,et al.  CSR Strategies in Response to Competitive Pressures , 2018 .

[48]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider , 2012 .

[49]  Mariya Bondareva,et al.  Dynamic Relational Contracts for Quality Enforcement in Supply Chains , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Guo-Ciang Wu Effects of Socially Responsible Supplier Development and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation on Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from SMEs , 2017 .

[51]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning , 2003 .

[52]  Michel Lebas,et al.  Performance measurement and performance management , 1995 .

[53]  N. Thongpapanl,et al.  Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation , 2018 .

[54]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients , 2014 .

[55]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2017 .

[56]  M. F. Acar,et al.  The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance , 2016 .

[57]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[58]  Kum Fai Yuen,et al.  The effect of continuous improvement capacity on the relationship between of corporate social performance and business performance in maritime transport in Singapore , 2016 .

[59]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Applied Soft Computing an Extended Compromise Ratio Method for Fuzzy Group Multi-attribute Decision Making with Swot Analysis , 2022 .

[60]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[61]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[62]  Mihai Paunescu,et al.  Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance , 2010 .

[63]  Archie B. Carroll,et al.  A Commentary and an Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance Measurement , 2000 .

[64]  I. Ioannou,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance , 2011 .

[65]  Hashem Omrani,et al.  Dynamic network data envelopment analysis model with fuzzy inputs and outputs: An application for Iranian Airlines , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[66]  T. C. Melewar,et al.  Linking corporate logo, corporate image, and reputation: An examination of consumer perceptions in the financial setting , 2014 .

[67]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits , 2015 .

[68]  Ma Ga Yang,et al.  Strategic supply chain partnership, environmental supply chain management practices, and performance outcomes: an empirical study of Korean firms , 2013 .

[69]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Socially Responsible Practices: An Exploratory Study on Scale Development using Stakeholder Theory , 2014, Decis. Sci..

[70]  C. Dennis,et al.  Examining the influence of corporate website favorability on corporate image and corporate reputation: Findings from fsQCA , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[71]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A Comparative analysis of two structural equation models : LISREL and PLS applied to market data , 1981 .

[72]  C. Giménez,et al.  Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration , 2016 .

[73]  Jeffery S. McMullen,et al.  Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action , 2007 .

[74]  Gangqiang Zhang,et al.  A multi-granulation decision-theoretic rough set method for distributed fc-decision information systems: An application in medical diagnosis , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[75]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Responsibility: The new business imperative , 2002 .

[76]  A. Ghobadian,et al.  The mediating effect of environmental and ethical behaviour on supply chain partnership decisions and management appreciation of supplier partnership risks , 2015 .

[77]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs' experiences with SA8000 , 2009 .

[78]  Vinit Parida,et al.  Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[79]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[80]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .